Intolerant Islam Wants to Ban Letter 'X'

I was reading some REVIEWS on books I would like to purchase over at AMAZON. One in particular…The Truth about Mohhamad, by Ali Sina. Then I came across this FORUM on the following story.

What a bloody joke. Only I am NOT laughing. Do we tell them what to do with their little squiggles in arabic. Could you imagine if these nutcases were to be assessed by a psychologist and shown the flash cards? What would they make of an ink-blot. Oh yeah, they would want that banned too. To me it looks like a picture of mo all distorted. They would take offence and so want it not to be in the testing.

Should they also ban the letter T / t - as it could be construed as a symbol of a cross. More so than the letter X. Or the letter B for looking like a pair of boobs side on? What are these jerks really trying to accomplish? To me, I use the letter xxxx to throw kisses to whoever I might be writing to.
Have a read of the story and some of the comments, they are seriously crackers.

http://www.amazon.com/Intolerant-Islam-Wants-Ban-Letter/forum/Fx3FF6P9TF7BK64/Tx160AVQR8037YY/1/ref=cm_cd_dp_tft_tp?%5Fencoding=UTF8&asin=1596985283&store=books
Intolerant Islam Wants to Ban Letter 'X'

This article from the New York Sun tells how the Saudi Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice wants to ban the letter 'X' because it looks too much like a cross. http://www.nysun.com/article/46707

Part of one of the quotes.

'The truth is as Robert Spencer said, Islam is the world's most intolerant religion. I think even he didn't think that they were so nutty and intolerant as to discuss getting rid of a letter. Next, what will happen to the '+' sign?'


The more I hear of islam, the more I read of islam, the more bloody angry I become. When are people really going to wake up and start shouting from the rooftops about this 'cancer on humanity'. We, know the cure, but we just have to convince the authorities to fund it.

Give Me A Break.

BEAUSEANT!!!!!!

I think it is time for us people living in Victoria, (or even in Australia), to arrange for some sort of get-together to form some type of group, whether it be just a group to organise strategies, forums, protests, or simply for support.... In my case, you are all I have in the way of support.

Gifts for the hard to buy for person

Yazzii Wildlife Collection: A new concept for Jewellery, Make-up and Cosmetic Storage. (Link is in the side bar)and I have also given her a wrap at my other blog BUTTERFLY HAVEN http://54cuddlybear.spaces.live.com/

This is a first for me. I was at Water Gardens Shopping Centre yesterday ( Thursday 26th March) just to have some lunch with my niece. As we were wandering around we came across a display of some wonderful looking items. We were looking at them and remarking on the practicality and quality of these products. I immediately thought of my other niece in Perth. Now she travels interstate on a fairly regular basis either for family reasons or business, she also travels to places in WA for short stays. Ah ha! I thought. Now she wears a lot of very nice and rather expensive jewellery, and I am always at a loss as to what to buy for her in the way of gifts.
So we got talking to the owner of this display, her name is Yazzii. We asked quite a few questions on her products and about her business and I was impressed that she supplies to many places around the world as a distributor.
Now, this display made a very nice change to the various shops that sell cheap jewellery, make-up bags and travel bags etc, and I had never seen her products displayed anywhere. This is because she has not displayed in this way before. She does distribute to specialty shops but not in this area. She has …I think from memory around 180 staff.
In the past I have ordered many, many various items from catalogues or online and rarely have I been 100% satisfied with them, especially the material of, say, T-shirts or bags. They never look as good as they do in the catalogues, and the quality of the material is such that I would never recommend them to others.
However, having seen these products, inspected the stitching on them, I was impressed at the quality. They are like quilting. Yazzii was telling me that she does expos at the Showgrounds in Ascot Vale, at Jeff’s Shed and Quilting Fairs. I went to a Quilting Fair 2 years ago but not this year when she was there.
Yazzii was selling these products at a cheaper rate than what can be purchased on line, or even in boutiques she distributes to, and had many ‘teasers’ as she called some of the products in the jewellery range . She also had a range of gorgeous other products.

I asked how long she would have her display there, and she told me for one more week. I tossed it around in my head and I really wanted to purchase one of these products for my niece. I didn’t think I would be able to get back there in time or even have the $’s so I decided then and there to purchase what I wanted. I would have liked to get a slightly bigger organiser for my niece, but then I had to think of my budget, and also of the amount of space she would have in her suitcase. So I went for the middle size zip up bag with quite a few separate compartments and a special ring holder.
My companion also purchased something for herself. Gee, I saw some stuff I would have loved to have bought, but I didn’t have enough money, nor would I in the future….my budget is tight.
Anyway, I asked Yazzii if I could write a piece about her products. She said ‘yes please.’
There were some particular items I really wanted to look at more closely, but I know me, and I would have not been able to help myself, I would have blown the rest of my money, plus I would have ended up owing my companion (again). I don’t know the proper name for it but it was a wrap of sorts, and I love this type of clothing, as I collect scarves and capes etc.
I have not yet visited her site, as I did not want to be influenced by anything she has on it. I wanted to write about it from my memory and my thoughts first.
There were so many things in this display and various materials and colours.
I must mention about the prices. For these products, the prices were most reasonable, and I was happy with them. So happy in fact, that I just know this first purchase will not be my one and only.

So if you are looking for a unique gift for that hard to buy person in your life, then go and have a look at these products…I am sure you will find something. Yazzii has buyers from all over the world. She has told me that her products are made in INDIA but supervised by her.


Her details are: yazzii website: www.yazzii.com

E-mail: sales@yazzii.com
Tel No: (03) 9899-9990
Fax: (03) 8610-0027
Showroom Address: Trade Only. Unit 4, 10 Clarice Road, Box Hill South, Victoria 3128

Islam In Action: UK:Police Identify 200 Children as Potential Terrorists

Islam In Action: UK:Police Identify 200 Children as Potential Terrorists

Only 200....
That’s all very well and good, but please, as if one of these kids parents are going to allow intervention. Now, what are the Police going to do about the parents if they are full on muzzos, who adore their scummy prophet and are all for the islamisation of the UK? And what pray tell are the Police to do about the Western kids being indoctrinated by the friends who are little islamists? And the adult converts?
Wouldn’t it be better for the Police to concentrate of enforcing law and order in the communities, and making sure that the muzzos are well watched.
If the imams are preaching hate in their mosques, which to me, are just a gathering place for them to decide on more strategies to gain more concessions from us infidels, and ways they can bring charges against us for insulting their pedophile prophet, then shouldn’t these places be policed in depth?
If I was a church going person, and went to a service where the Pastor or whatever was preaching hate against the muslims, how long do you think they would get away with that? It would be a one time event only.

"We are committed to stopping people becoming or supporting terrorists or violent extremists. The aim of the Channel project is to directly support vulnerable people by providing supportive interventions when families, communities and networks raise concerns about their behaviour."

The only way they are going to stop people becoming or supporting terrorists is to deport those muzzos who are spreading their hate and committing crimes. Even invalidating and stripping them and their families of their citizenship papers. First plane out of there, all expenses paid. It will be cheaper in the long run.
Now all we need to do is convince the Aussie pollies to wake up and stop muslim immigration, and as for the boat people, afganis & pakis…10 in the last year alone,
Either blow their boats out of the water, forbid any naval vessels from picking them up, thus allowing them to claim refugee status, or get them on the first plane back to their countries. Mr. Howard had it right, and there was almost no boats coming illegally to our shores. Since Rudd has been in power, there have been many of them.

BTW, the muzzos are forming their own communities here as well. I believe there is one up North established by a convert who was a pugilist. I have no ideas where the others are, as they are not advertised or reported in the news here, but Australia has vast amounts of Forrest and desert areas, and bush land where communities could easily be set up. Other than that they just take over the suburbs and build their mosques and schools no matter how many people complain or lodge protests with the council concerned.

I don’t know about you and your readers Chris, but to me, we are losing ‘the battle’ and I can’t see any winning scores on our part until it is too late then people will remove their blinkers and say, “why wasn’t I told?” Then I will have the pleasure in saying “I told you so”. The silence among my family members and associates is deafening, and they have made it clear to me they are not interested in my theories or racist remarks, and it won’t happen here type of thing. They have also made it clear that; they do not have the time or the inclination to look at any links or stories/articles I send them about anything to do with islam etc. It does sadden me, and the only one I am getting through to is my daughter, and that is on the banking issue.
So I will just keep learning and stay within my networks here on the net and FB and Bloggs etc, and I will keep reading the news articles I find, books & DVD’s that are recommended, and pray that when the time comes, that my family stay safe.

Bring on the Crusades…BEAUSEANT!!!
Christian Nanna

Tuberculosis on the rise - again.

Now this subject made me shudder. Why, you might ask??? Because I know what it is like to have this rotten bloody disease. I was found to have it when I was 4 years old. I apparently got it from family members who had been in the wars.
As the youngest of 5 children, and born to parents who were in their late 30's, I was just seen as a sickly kid who always had a cold. It wasn't even picked up with all the bloody noses I would have and vomit up blood through the night. My parents just thought as I often had nose bleeds, that it would happen in my sleep, thus swallowing the blood and vomit it up. (Gross yeah).. It was however, picked up when my parent's bedroom walls were covered in blood clots from my projectile vomiting in the middle of the night. This was the beginning of my next year and a half in hospital, isolated from my family. My sisters would have to wave to me through the ward window. The treatment was totally gross back then. Tubes down my throat, up my nose, injections all the time, pills that would choke a bloody horse. After the first year and my 5th birthday in hospital, I would gradually be allowed to have some weekend visits home, then when I was released from the hospital I was confined to bed rest and light activity and huge tins of horse choking pills. I remember in the 1980's there were a few cases of TB detected in Victoria, well I can tell you, I was at the TB Clinic getting X-Rays quick smart.. I was terrified of ever getting it again. Australia used to have compulsory vaccinations for this. TB was eventually eradicated from our vocabulary and hospitals resulting in no more compulsory testing or vaccinations.
Now if our Immigration Policy is such that they are going to be letting infected people in this country without the proper screenings, and especially all the African migrants/refugees etc. Then surely we need to be doing something about re-introducing screenings and vaccinations against this horrible disease.

How about refusing entry to anyone with any type of infectious disease. That would suit me perfectly!!!!!


Resurgent Tuberculosis Deadly Disease of Globalization
by Christine Craig
BIOLOGY & MEDICINE 21st CENTURY Science & Technology Spring/Summer 2007 73

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com


Two epidemiological reports released in the last few months on the extent of extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in South Africa, are critical warnings of the global threat of this virtually incurable disease, especially in conjunction with its “companion” ailment, HIV/AIDS.
TB in any form is not some rare, exotic ailment, but an illness whose onset and transmissibility have long
been understood. With decent infrastructure and living conditions, TB could have been contained and driven
back to almost nil incidence. However, with the last three decades of international decline in economic conditions, affecting concentrations of people in Africa and Asia, and in localized areas in the Americas and Europe, the resurgence of TB, with its deadly mutations, was predictable.1
On Sept. 16, 2006, the Department of Health for South Africa issued a horrifying report on the presence of XDR-TB,2 including the situation in KwaZulu- Natal. Certain patients at the Church of Scotland Hospital in Tugela Ferry were found, in the Fall of 2005, to be infected with a strain of TB not responding to any
treatment. A survey over the following 12 months, turned up 53 patients, almost all co-infected with HIV, who
were suffering from untreatable TB which, in the immune-compromised patients, was quickly fatal. All but one of the 53 died within three weeks of diagnosis. Those 53 victims represented 16 percent of all confirmed cases of XDRTB globally during 2006. This bombshell report conjured up images of a catastrophe in the making in the AIDS-wracked areas of South Africa, precipitating a flurry of meetings among
international health professionals, and leading to the creation of the World Health Organization (WHO) Global XDR-TB Task Force, which convened in October to address the threat of untreatable TB in the age of HIV. The Global XDR-TB Task Force found, to its horror (but no great surprise) that, in the renewed war against a strengthening foe, the ammunition was low, and the supply lines were cut. Although warnings had been out since the early 1990s that multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB was a rising threat, as evidenced by
the well-documented outbreaks in the United States and in Eastern Europe during the late 1980s, no agencies had really taken it seriously as a global danger at the time.
XDR-TB is now considered endemic in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. In the January 2007 issue of PLoS Medicine, J.A. Singh et al. presented a truly frightening view of the situation.
More than 30 new cases are detected each month, with a total of more than 300 cases, and the disease has been reported in 39 hospitals, plus other areas of the province. And that is just the official tally, which most certainly understates the case, as many of the poor never seek medical help. The authors note: “In recognition of the global threat posed by these factors, on September 9, 2006, WHO urged a
response to the outbreak akin to recent global efforts to control severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the bird flu....”


Europe’s White Plague
That the Western world would be so shocked and surprised by this turn of events is remarkable in itself, considering that, just two centuries ago, tuberculosis was so virulent in Europe that many 72 Spring/Summer 2007 21st CENTURY Science & Technology BIOLOGY & MEDICINE feared it would destroy Western civilization. The list of artists, philosophers, and scientists who suffered or died from TB is endless, including
Friedrich Schiller, Percy Shelley, Bernhard Riemann, John Keats, and Vladimir Vernadsky.
It is estimated that in 1800, the death rate per year from tuberculosis in Western Europe (and in urban North America) was 1 percent. At the peak of the long epidemic, perhaps 25 percent of Western Europeans
died of tuberculosis. There was no cure for the disease, nor was the causative agent known at that time.
And yet, over the next two centuries, “consumption” (as it was known) lost its grip on the European continent, slowly and steadily receding, even in the absence of any satisfactory medical treatments for the disease. Those with active disease were still very likely to die, but fewer were getting active disease.
It has been just 125 years since the famed bacteriologist and Göttingen-trained physician Robert Koch identified and characterized the minuscule tuberculosis bacillus in his home laboratory in Berlin, in 1881, proving it to be the source of the disease, and giving hope that the TB leviathan then devouring the
European populace, could be brought down by science.

It has been almost 100 years since the discovery of the only vaccine ever developed against tuberculosis—the Bacille Calmette Guèrin (BCG) vaccine, based on a highly attenuated Mycobacterium bovis strain—a vaccine found to give some protection to children against the gruesome childhood killers, miliary tuberculosis and tubercular meningitis. It has been only some 60 years since the development of the first effective antibiotics against tuberculosis: streptomycin and para-amino salicylic acid (PAS), discovered by Selman Waksman and Jorgen Lehmann, respectively, around the end of World War II.

By 1960, a team led by Dr. John Crofton of Edinburgh, had successfully tackled the recalcitrant tuberculosis problem in Scotland with a remarkable protocol using triple-antibiotic therapy in an 18-month-long treatment regimen, which could successfully cure even advanced pulmonary tuberculosis cases caused by drug-resistant strains. And, under the joint control of the British Medical Research Council and the WHO, trials of Crofton’s methods had been carried out in Madras, India among the poor—with astounding success. Policy makers, including scientists, began to believe that TB could be tackled by drug technology alone, even without costly investments in economic development and public health infrastructure! A mere five years later, tuberculosis had already been dropped from courses at the Harvard School of Public Health, a disease deemed no longer important in the training of future health-care professionals. Science had won, and tuberculosis, long the scourge of Europe and the U.S., receded from the consciousness of the populace (Figure 1).

The world didn’t really take notice of tuberculosis again as a global problem until the second half of the 1980s, when the long trend of TB incidence- decrease in developed countries was shattered by a sudden upward tick in notifications, noted most strongly in the United States and in post- Soviet Eastern Europe. The situation was documented in great detail in the United States by outraged public health professionals, especially in New York City, where most of the increase was occurring (Figure 2).3

The Nature of the Beast
Tuberculosis is usually caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an ingenious and insidious organism: a minuscule bacterium hardly bigger than a virus, surrounded by an impervious waxy coat. In many of its features within the host body it acts similarly to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), secreting
itself within immune cells called phagocytes, the very cells that would otherwise seek it out and destroy it.
Within the phagocyte, the tubercular bacillus hides in the central vacuole, protected from chemical destruction by its waxy coat. Here it grows and reproduces very slowly, and is spread with the phagocytes throughout the lymphatic system. Most often, the disease affects adults in its pulmonary form. Children are often afflicted with primary infections affecting the lymphatic system or other organs, including a rapidly fatal systemic form called military tuberculosis. During the host’s first (primary) infection with TB, a battle with the immune system ensues, and, almost always, the immune system wins, at least in the short term. The infection becomes “latent.”


This is a partial pdf of the article. To purchase the entire issue, please use the link below:

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com

DDT and over-population.

Here is a very interesting article about DDT, population explosion and the Political reasons behind it all.

I have only ever heard of DDT as one of the most dangerous and deadly chemicals ever made. It is banned here in OZ, but after reading this article, I once again see how politics and PC can get in the way of common sense. What really grabbed my attention was a paragraph of the banning of DDT was the blame for a population explosion in 3rd world countries. Now, far from me having a scientific mind, but is this not something that could once again get diseases like malaria under some control and so save many thousands of lives from dying horrible deaths. I mean to say, many people in 3rd world countries live in absolute poverty and diseased beyond help.
Or this just one more huge piece of propaganda for the Democratic socialists run by LaRouche who was the/is the king pin behind Soros, or the other way around. In a previous comment I had mentioned my mind could not recall certain names associated with Soros, but as soon as I saw this article I knew where the connections in my memory banks were going.
But back to the question of do we really need DDT back on the agenda to save lives, from horrible mosquito borne diseases etc? To grow crops to feed people? In a world over nearing over-population, and I say that because I believe there are too many people for this world to sustain in a livable manner. Just my opinion. What do you think?

This was a link from AIM, to a Science blog.

Bring Back DDT, and Science With It!
By Marjorie Mazel Hecht
Excerpt of Editorial from Summer 2002 issue


The 1972 U.S. ban on DDT is responsible for a genocide 10 times larger than that for which we sent Nazis to the gallows at Nuremberg. It is also responsible for a menticide which has already condemned one entire generation to a dark age of anti-science ignorance, and is now infecting a new one.
The lies and hysteria spread to defend the DDT ban are typical of the irrationalist, anti-science wave which has virtually destroyed rational forms of discourse in our society. If you want to save science—and human lives—the fight to bring back DDT, now being championed by that very electable candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., had better be at the top of your agenda.
Sixty million people have died needlessly of malaria, since the imposition of the 1972 ban on DDT, and hundreds of millions more have suffered from this debilitating disease. The majority of those affected are children. Of the 300 to 500 million new cases of malaria each year, 200 to 300 million are children, and malaria now kills one child every 30 seconds. Ninety percent of the reported cases of malaria are in Africa, and 40 percent of the world’s population, inhabitants of tropical countries, are threatened by the increasing incidence of malaria.
The DDT ban does not only affect tropical nations. In the wake of the DDT ban, the United States stopped its mosquito control programs, cutting the budgets for mosquito control and monitoring. Exactly as scientists had warned 25 years ago, we are now facing increases of mosquito-borne killer diseases—West Nile fever and dengue, to name the most prominent.
What DDT Can Do
Malaria is a preventable mosquito-borne disease. It can be controlled by spraying a tiny amount of DDT on the walls of houses twice a year. DDT is cheaper than other pesticides, more effective, and not harmful to human beings or animals.
Even where mosquito populations have developed resistance to DDT, it is more effective (and less problematic) than alternative chemicals. The reason is that mosquitoes are repelled by the DDT on house walls and do not stay around to bite and infect the inhabitants. This effect is known as “excito-repellency,” and has been shown to be a dominant way that DDT controls malaria-bearing mosquitoes, in addition to killing them on contact.1 Studies have demonstrated this for all major species of malaria-bearing mosquitoes.
It costs only $1.44 per year to spray one house with DDT. The more toxic substitutes cost as much as 10 to 20 times more and require more frequent applications, making spraying programs prohibitively expensive. In addition, replacement pesticides have to be applied more frequently and are more toxic.
Banned to Kill People
DDT came into use during World War II, and in a very short time saved more lives and prevented more diseases than any other man-made chemical in history. Millions of troops and civilians, in particular war refugees, were saved from typhus because one DDT dusting killed the body lice that spread that dread disease.
Why was DDT banned, 30 years after its World War II introduction and spectacular success in saving lives? The reason was stated bluntly by Alexander King, founder of the Malthusian Club of Rome, who wrote in a biographical essay in 1990, “My chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is that it has greatly added to the population problem.” King was particularly concerned that DDT had dramatically cut the death rates in the developing sector, and thus increased population growth.
As King correctly observed, the incidence of malaria, and its death rates, were vastly reduced by DDT spraying. To take one example: Sri Lanka (Ceylon) had 2.8 million cases of malaria and more than 12,500 deaths in 1946, before the use of DDT. In 1963, after a large-scale spraying campaign, the number of cases fell to 17, and the number of deaths fell to 1. But five years after the stop of spraying, in 1969, the number of deaths had climbed to 113, and the number of cases to 500,000. Today, malaria rates have soared in countries that stopped spraying. In South Africa, the malaria incidence increased by 1,000 percent in the late 1990s.
The Silent Spring Fraud
The campaign to ban DDT got its start with the publication of Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring in 1962. Carson’s popular book was a fraud. She played on people’s emotions, and to do so, she selected and falsified data from scientific studies, as entomologist Dr. J. Gordon Edwards has documented in his analysis of the original scientific studies that Carson cited.2
As a result of the propaganda and lies, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency convened scientific hearings and appointed a Hearing Examiner, Edmund Sweeney, to run them. Every major scientific organization in the world supported DDT use, submitted testimony, as did the environmentalist opposition. The hearings went on for seven months, and generated 9,000 pages of testimony. Hearing Examiner Sweeney then ruled that DDT should not be banned, based on the scientific evidence: “DDT is not carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic to man [and] these uses of DDT do not have a deleterious effect on fish, birds, wildlife, or estuarine organisms,” Sweeney concluded.
Two months later, without even reading the testimony or attending the hearings, EPA administrator William Ruckelshaus overruled the EPA hearing officer and banned DDT. He later admitted that he made the decision for “political” reasons. “Science, along with economics, has a role to play . .. .. [but] the ultimate decision remains political,” Ruckelshaus said.
The U.S. decision had a rapid effect in the developing sector, where the State Department made U.S. aid contingent on countries not using any pesticide that was banned in the United States. The U.S. Agency for International Development discontinued its support for DDT spraying programs, and instead increased funding for birth control programs.
Other Western nations—Sweden and Norway, for example—also pressured recipient nations to stop the use of DDT. Belize abandoned DDT in 1999, because Mexico, under pressure from the United States and NAFTA, had stopped the manufacture of DDT, which was Belize’s source. Purchases of replacement insecticides would take up nearly 90 percent of Belize’s malaria control budget. Mozambique stopped the use of DDT, “because 80 percent of the country’s health budget came from donor funds, and donors refused to allow the use of DDT,” reported the British Medical Journal (March 11, 2000).
The World Bank and the World Health Organization, meanwhile, responded to the rise in malaria incidence with a well-publicized “Roll Back Malaria” program, begun in 1989, which involves no insect control measures, only bed nets, personnel training, and drug therapies—a prescription for failure.
POPs Convention Is Genocide
In 1995, despite the official documentation of increases in malaria cases and malaria deaths, the United Nations Environment Program began an effort to make the ban on DDT worldwide. UNEP proposed to institute “legally binding” international controls banning what are called “persistent organic pollutants” or POPs, including DDT. Ratification of the POPs Convention, finalized in 2001, is now pending in the U.S. Senate, where it has the support of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, including committee chairman James Jeffords (Ind.-Vt.) and committee member Joe Lieberman (D.-Conn.). President Bush has already endorsed the U.S. signing on to the POPs Convention.
The evidence of DDT’s effectiveness is dramatic. In South America, where malaria is endemic, malaria rates soared in countries that had stopped spraying houses with DDT after 1993: Guyana, Bolivia, Paraguay, Peru, Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela. In Ecuador, however, which increased its use of DDT after 1993, the malaria rate was rapidly reduced by 60 percent.
But DDT spraying is not a magic bullet cure-all. Eliminating mosquito-borne diseases here and around the world requires in-depth public health infrastructure and trained personnel—as were in place in the 1950s and 1960s, when DDT began to rid the world of malaria. And mosquito-borne illness is not the only scourge now threatening us. A growing AIDS pandemic, and the return of tuberculosis and other killer diseases, now also menace growing parts of the world’s population, particularly in those areas where human immune systems are challenged by malnutrition and poorly developed (or nonexistent) water and sanitation systems.
To solve this worsening problem as a whole—a disgrace in face of the scientific achievements the world has made—we must reverse the entire course of the past 30 years’ policymaking and return to a society based on production, scientific progress, and rationality. The onrushing world depression crisis, demands a new FDR-style approach to economic reconstruction in the United States. The recognized spokesman for such a reform of our economic and monetary policies is the very electable candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Lyndon H. LaRouche.
The United States should not ratify the POPs Convention with its phase-out of DDT and other valuable chemicals. On the contrary, this nation should bring back DDT now, under the provisions of existing U.S. law that allow the use of DDT in health emergencies. If the continuing mass murder of millions of people is not an emergency, what is?
1. A summary of this work can be found in an article by Donald R. Roberts, et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1997), pp. 295-302.
2. J. Gordon Edwards, “The Lies of Rachel Carson,” 21st Century, Summer 1992.
Edwards, a professor emeritus at San Jose State University in California, drank a spoonful of DDT in front of his entomology classes at the beginning of each school year, to make the point that DDT is not harmful to human beings. Now 83, and still fighting for the truth about DDT, Edwards is an avid mountain climber.


http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com

Internment camps and Euro coming your way.

Looks like Soros is going to get what he has wanted for many years now. Back in the 1980's I became aware of Soros and the Australian Socialist coalition. Soros was backing this euro dollar and to the socialists Soros was their god, their hero, he was to this crowd as Mo is to the islamists. . They literally worshipped the ground he walked on. He has fancied himself the world leader for a long time now, and he would use his money to prove he was worth it. What I would like to know is...where did and from where does Soros get all his money from???? He spouted for a global monetary system way back then and I think he wanted it called the euro dollar or something like that. I really wish I had of kept all the paper work I had on him when I was involved in the political realm, in the Liberal Right (conservatives). And I had it because I wanted to know what this group of socialist, commie lovers were on about and up to. I also had to put up with the Uni crowd professing their worship for him and I really got to hate going to some of my classes, especially sociology where the professional students all wanted to live in some sort of Fabian society, or a utopia of their own making through socialism. I was known as a bit of a snob back then simply because i wouldn't hang with the crowd, and i did my own thing. I was there for an education, they were there for the Austudy money so as they wouldn't have to work. They were also activists that got involved with the usual protests against government etc, and they absolutely hated anything to do with Jeff kennet or the Liberal Pollies.. They absolutely loved the required reading material, engels, marx, and all the other leftists who believed in the social construct crap.
So are we are to have a global financial dictatorship? is there going to be any sort of a referendum on this and other issues within Australia, or are we just going to be the good little 'sheeple' and baa baa all the way to our own demise?

UN and IMF Back Agenda For Global Financial Dictatorship
Posted by: "Paul Joseph Watson" watson-paul3@sky.com onedeaddj
Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:01 am (PDT)


UN & IMF Back Agenda For Global Financial Dictatorship
Frog march to new world reserve currency system continues apace

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, March 27, 2009

Both the IMF and the United Nations have thrown their weight behind proposals to implement a new world reserve currency system to replace the dollar as part of the acceleration towards a global financial dictatorship, in the same week that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CFR globalists that he was "open" to the idea.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/un-imf-back-agenda-for-global-financial-dictatorship.html


Two-Faced Geithner Assures CFR Puppet Masters He's "Open" To Global
Posted by: "Paul Joseph Watson" watson-paul3@sky.com onedeaddj
Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:25 am (PDT)


Two-Faced Geithner Assures CFR Puppet Masters He's "Open" To Global Currency
Treasury Secretary a traitor, tells American people one thing, CFR elitists another, as move towards global monetary union accelerates

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, March 26, 2009

In a near complete reversal of his comments on Tuesday, when he told a Congressional hearing that there were no plans to move towards a global currency to supplant the dollar, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner sought to please the elitist CFR by assuring them that he was "open" to the notion of a new global currency system.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/two-faced-geithner-assures-cfr-puppet-masters-hes-open-to-global-currency.html


Schwarzenegger To Provide Government Camps For Homeless

Shut down and takeover of "tent cities" stokes fears of internment pretext

Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Thursday, March 26, 2009

Plans to shut down tent cities in California and relocate homeless people to government-run facilities have stoked fears that the move could be a pretext for a wider internment of Americans in the event of a total economic collapse.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/schwarzenegger-to-provide-government-camps-for-homeless.html

Internment camps for homeless people when they can not afford to house themselves???. Is this what I am reading? Is it because the govt. will make sure the muzzos are living comfortably as a further act of appeasement and to hell with the Citizens who once worked and paid taxes. How about the internment camps for the muzzos so as to keep everyone else safe, much like what happened to the Japanese people and no matter how long they lived in Australia. The jap money was printed and ready for distribution but at the last minute it was all shelved thanks to our brave soldiers who fought their asses off protecting us all, including my father.. And don't let anyone tell you that this money bit is rumour or some conspiracy theory, coz it was printed. I fear that Australoia will follow suit and have camps ready for internment reasons....but the real big question is...internment for whom?

Finnish Trial for speaking the truth.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

***** JIHAD WATCH *****
Home page:

Free speech death watch: Finnish politician to be tried for blaspheming Islam

Blasphemer Besides blasphemy, Halla-aho was "ordered to stand trial for publishing on his blog that Islam's prophet was a pedophile."

Here again we encounter the Orwellian, or perhaps more precisely Alice-In-Wonderland, Through-the-Looking-Glass quality of today's public discourse. The collection...

Full article:
AOL users: Click here


Gees, I suppose Australia had better start building those prisons, coz we are gonna have a lot of people using them if we are going to prison for speaking the truth. I suspect Mr. Rudd will go along with outlawing freedom of speech here soon. Anything to keep 'His Soul Mate' happy.

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Just to clarify my last remark......

[Christian Nanna] New comment on EX-muslims against islam.‏
From: Mohamed (noreply-comment@blogger.com)
Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2009 7:54:38 AM

Mohamed has left a new comment on your post "EX-muslims against islam":

Where in the Koran it says to fight people? The problem is people do not seperate the Koran from hadiths. Hadiths have the same place in islam as the Talmud in Judaism. The Koran came to confirm the Torah and Gospel but condemned the Talmud and Trinity.

The Koran preaches peace and tolerance and guarantees freedom of religion in over 30 verses.

Now THATS the truth


Well here ya go Mo..just in case, you can read the article in ISLAM IN ACTION. and maybe you might learn a thing or two about what TRUTH really is. Take your blinkers of Mo...and you just might see life and the koran for what it really is.
Beauseant!!!!

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video


Perfect timing to answer Mohamad's last question to me....show me where in the koran it say to use violence...well here ya go Mo... read it and weep. Thanks Chris...coming to my rescue yet once again....

Mourners farewell Corporal Hopkins

Why is this not news of importance??? This soldier gave his life. His family, friends and fellow troopers are in mourning, yet it doesn’t seem to rank high enough to be read. So much for Aussie Pride.

Mourners farewell Corporal Hopkins
15:46 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794307&rss=yes
12 Flocks

--- --- --- --- ---

Well of course they are gonna get the blame. White, blue-eyed people are the only people in the world who buy goods, and spend money or not. No one else could possibly be blamed. Thank goodness I have green eyes.

'White, blue-eyed people caused crisis'
16:18 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794343
19 Flocks
--- --- --- ---- ---

What conditions could ever be agreed on as far as the taliban are concerned?. There is no compromise, no agreement and certainly no trust in them living up to any conditions to be had with these murderous bastards. Notice how many flocks this one has had. 8. The apathy of the general population of people is beginning to really piss me off. Surely the headlines are enough to get people to read them so as they might know what is happening in this crazy world.

UK may talk to Taliban 'with conditions'
16:12 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794148
8 Flocks
--- - - --- - - - ---

And just how does Hussein Obama reckon he is gonna manage this one. Is he going to go and personally search every inch of paki land to search for bin laden and the Taliban insurgents. Or doesn’t he know they are hiding there?
‘"Seven-and-a-half years after September 11, the al-Qaeda core leadership, Osama bin Laden and others, have moved from Kandahar, Afghanistan, to a location unknown, somewhere in Pakistan," one official said.’ And this, ‘Another key goal of the strategy is to support Pakistan's besieged Democratic government, and to help Islamabad crack down on al-Qaeda and Taliban havens on its territory’.

Obama plans to 'dismantle' al-Qaeda
14:42 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
By Stephen Collinson
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794255
21 Flocks

- - - - - --- --- --- --- --- ---


This culling of SEAL PUPS is a disgrace. The IFAW and the Animals Rights Groups should be jumping all over these hunters. Before anyone goes screaming about Kangaroos in Australia being culled…yeah it does happen however, these animals are destroying farmer’s crops and spreading disease. Just like rabbits did and still do. What harm are these seal pups doing???? What, for a bit of bloody fur. GREED.

Canadian sealers cull more than 19,000
11:01 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/794060/canadian-sealers-cull-more-than-19000

46 Flocks

--- --- - --- --- --- ---
Wow, this one had all of 7 Flocks. People must really be interested in the war on terror and knowing that terrorist scum are being released only to be let loose back among the American people, but have no fear, I am sure they will make their way back to fighting with their islamist mates, just like others who have been released from Gitmo.

Some Gitmo inmates may be released in US
13:23 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794227

7 Flocks

-- --- --- --- --- ---

Talk about black & white comedy team. These 2 are going to be the absolute downfall for both our Countries. God help us all. Is all I can say to this piece.

Rudd a partner for years to come: Obama
05:35 AEST Wed Mar 25 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/792956/rudd-a-partner-for-years-to-come-obama

President Barack Obama has said he hoped to partner with Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd for "years to come" after forging a "meeting of the minds" in their first White House talks.
126 Flocks

--- --- --- --- ---
So where are all the do-gooders when people can’t even raise a flag.

Indonesia arresting protesters: Amnesty
17:40 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=794402
1 Flock
--- --- --- --- ---

But this story of world-wide importance. I am sure everyone would want to know about this…and yeah 478 people Flocked this piece of trash. Who gives a shit what people do to themselves in a bloody carwash….not like teeny-tots can take their peddle cars there to be washed and so be exposed to perverts..

Man jailed for vacuum sex act
Friday, March 27, 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/793983/man-jailed-for-vacuum-sex-act
478 Flocks

Crusader supporters combat a different GFC (Global Financial Crisis)

It is good to see that Australia has some bright, intelligent, young up and coming Christians to be our leaders in the years to come.
Even if you are not a Christian, then it is better to encourage people to live a good and decent lives. These young people are growing in numbers and will be the leaders of the future. Isn't it better than having the thugs and muslim radicals threatening to take our freedoms away from us and breaking the economy with their economic jihads in various areas that are weakoning the Australian purse.
Of course, when I seen the name of this group I just had to go and have a look. Yeah Crusaders....bring it on...Beauseant. CNanna

Crusaders' Vision
From the Australian Christian Channel News.
http://www.acctv.com.au/articledetail.asp?id=6653

The Crusader Union is a Bible-based, interdenominational, Christian youth organisation which seeks to:
Share Jesus with a new generation
Nurture Christians and
Encourage church membership
Founded in 1930, Crusaders currently reaches over 30,000 young people with the gospel each year through the following programs:

Crusaders was founded in 1930 by the Rev. Dr Howard Guinness. Dr Howard Guinness was a visionary man who was keen to strengthen Christian work among school students. He saw voluntary groups as a key to achieving this. From small beginnings in just four schools, Crusaders has now grown to serve 100 independent schools in New South Wales. In 2005, it is anticipated that over 5,000 students will attend Crusaders Holiday and School camps and a further 25,000 will have heard Crusader staff speak at their schools.
Crusaders desires to help school students grow in their love and knowledge of Jesus Christ. We seek to equip students to be disciples of Jesus and to witness to their friends. As well as attending the CRU group at their school, we always look to encourage students to be involved in their local churches.

Islam In Action: UN Body OKs Call to Curb Religious Criticism

Islam In Action: UN Body OKs Call to Curb Religious Criticism


"India, which normally votes along with the council's majority of developing nations, abstained in protest at the fact that Islam was the only religion specifically named as deserving protection."

Good on India for protesting against the ridiculous farce. If Mr Rudd is so eager to have a seat at the UN, and him being a professed Christian, will he make a protest as well.? I make a protest in the name of Christianity and every other religion, that we do not like being called filthy names and threatened by muslims. So are they going to be hauled over the coals and charged with whatever, when they insult anyone of the Christian Faith or anyone who is not a bloody muslim.
Give me a break.

Aussies needed.

I believe we need more Aussies to join this fight against the current muslim/sharia law/jihadist situation. I know there are many bloggers out there who are just as concerned as I am.
When Chris Logan got his FACEBOOK up and running, I thought..."excellent job" There are many people on this network and as far as I am aware, there is one other Australian besides myself in this particular network. I think the more people on the one network can be a formidable force, especially one that holds hands across the seas.

You can get there through my links.

You can access my FB by following this link. Diane johnson

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/profile.php?id=1050993764&ref=profile


To view Christopher's profile or write on his Wall, follow this link:http://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=1481860912&mid=304e4eG3ea4e464G616643G1b


Come on Aussies, we can do it.

BEAUSEANT.

Judeo-Christian Violence vs. Islamic Violence

This is a very timely article. More in response to muslims against sharia, equating crusades with islamists. There is NO comparison except in the sense that the Crusades happened in response to muslim rapes, pillages and murders. An excellent essay from Raymond Ibrahim on MEF.

Conflating History with Theology
Judeo-Christian Violence vs. Islamic Violence
by Raymond Ibrahim
Jihad Watch
March 15, 2009


http://www.meforum.org/2105/judeo-christian-violence-vs-islamic-violence

Especially after the terrorist strikes of 9/11, Islam has often been accused of being intrinsically violent. Many point to the Koran and other Islamic scriptures and texts as proof that violence and intolerance vis-à-vis non-Muslims is inherent to Islam. In response, a number of apologetics have been offered. The fundamental premise of almost all of these is that Islam's purported violence—as found in Islamic scriptures and history—is no different than the violence committed by other religious groups throughout history and as recorded in their scriptures, such as Jews and Christians. The argument, in short, is that it is not Islam per se but rather human nature that is prone to violence.
So whenever the argument is made that the Koran as well as the historical words and deeds of Islam's prophet Muhammad and his companions evince violence and intolerance, the counter-argument is immediately made: What about the historical atrocities committed by the Hebrews in years gone by and as recorded in their scriptures (AKA, the Old Testament)? What about the brutal cycle of violence Christians have committed in the name of their faith against both fellow Christians and non-Christians?
Several examples are then offered from the Bible as well as Judeo-Christian history. Two examples especially—one biblical, the other historic—are often cited as paradigmatic of the religious violence inherent to both Judaism and Christianity and usually put an end to the debate of whether Islam is unique in regards to its teachings and violence.
The first is the military conquest of the land of Canaan by the Hebrews (c. 1200 BC), which has increasingly come to be characterized as a "genocide." Yahweh told Moses:
But of the cities of these peoples which Yahweh your God gives you as an inheritance, you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, but you shall utterly destroy them—the Hittite, Amorite, Canaanite, Perizzite, Hivite, and Jebusite—just as Yahweh your God has commanded you, lest they teach you to do according to all their abominations which they have done for their gods, and you sin against Yahweh your God (Deuteronomy 20: 16-18).
So Joshua [Moses' successor] conquered all the land: the mountain country and the South and the lowland and the wilderness slopes, and all their kings; he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as Yahweh God of Israel had commanded (Joshua 10:40).
The second example revolves around the Crusader wars waged by Medieval European Christians. To be sure, the Crusades were a "counter-attack" on Islam—not an unprovoked assault as is often depicted by revisionist history. A united Christendom sought to annex the Holy Land of Jerusalem, which, prior to its conquest by Islam in the 7th century, was an integral part of Christendom for nearly 400 years.
Moreover, Muslim invasions and atrocities against Christians were on the rise in the decades before the Crusades were launched in 1096. For example, in 1071, the Seljuk Turks had crushed the Byzantines in the pivotal battle of Manzikert and in effect annexed a major chunk of Byzantine Anatolia (opening the way for the eventual capture of Constantinople centuries later). A few decades earlier, the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim desecrated and destroyed a number of important churches—such as the Church of St. Mark in Egypt and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem—and decreed several even more oppressive than usual decrees against Christians and Jews. It is in this backdrop that Pope Urban called for the Crusades:
From the confines of Jerusalem and the city of Constantinople a horrible tale has gone forth and very frequently has been brought to our ears, namely, that a race from the kingdom of the Persians [i.e., Muslim Turks]…has invaded the lands of those Christians and has depopulated them by the sword, pillage and fire; it has led away a part of the captives into its own country, and a part it has destroyed by cruel tortures; it has either entirely destroyed the churches of God or appropriated them for the rites of its own religion (from the chronicles of Robert the Monk).
Nonetheless, history attests that these Crusades were violent and bloody. After breaching the walls of Jerusalem in 1099, the Crusaders slaughtered almost every single inhabitant of the Holy City. According to the Medieval chronicle, the Gesta Danorum "the slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles." Moreover, there is the 1204 sack of Constantinople, wherein Crusader slew Christian.
In light of the above—one a prime example of "Hebraic" violence from the Bible, the other from Christian history—why should Islam be the one religion always characterized as intrinsically violent, simply because its holy book and its history also contain violence? Why should non-Muslims always point to the Koran and ancient history as evidence of Islam's violence while never looking to their own scriptures and history?
While such questions are popular, they reveal a great deal of confusion between history and theology, between the temporal actions of men and what are understood to be the immutable words of God. The fundamental error being that Judeo-Christian history—which is violent—is being conflated with Islamic theology—which commands violence. Of course all religions have had their fair share of violence and intolerance towards the "other." Whether this violence is ordained by God or whether warlike man merely wished it thus is the all-important question.
Old Testament violence is an interesting case in point. Yahweh clearly ordered the Hebrews to annihilate the Canaanites and surrounding peoples. Such violence is therefore an expression of God's will, for good or ill. Regardless, all the historic violence committed by the Hebrews and recorded in the Old Testament is just that—history. It happened; God commanded it. But it revolved around a specific time and place and was directed against a specific people. At no time did such violence go on to become standardized or codified into Jewish law (i.e., the Halakha).
This is where Islamic violence is unique. Though similar to the violence of the Old Testament—commanded by God and manifested in history—certain aspects of Islamic violence have become standardized in Islamic law (i.e., Sharia) and apply at all times. Thus while the violence found in the Koran is in fact historical, its ultimate significance is theological, or, more specifically, doctrinal. Consider the following Koranic verses, better known as the "sword-verses":
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the pagans wherever you find them—take them [captive], besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due [i.e. submit to Islam], then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (K 9:5).
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger [i.e. do not adhere to Islamic law], nor acknowledge the religion of Truth [i.e. Islam], from the people of the book [i.e. Jews and Christians], until they pay tribute with willing submission, and feel themselves utterly subdued (K 9:29).
As with Old Testament verses where Yahweh commanded the Hebrews to attack and slay their neighbors, the sword-verses also have a historical context. Allah first issued these commandments after the Muslims under Muhammad's leadership had grown sufficiently strong enough to invade their Christian and pagan neighbors. But unlike the bellicose verses and anecdotes of the Old Testament, the sword-verses became fundamental to Islam's subsequent relationship to both the "people of the book" (Christians and Jews) and the "pagans" (Hindus, Buddhists, animists, etc). For instance, based on 9:5, Islamic law mandates that pagans and polytheists must either convert to Islam or be killed, while 9:29 is the primary source of Islam's well-known discriminatory practices against Christians and Jews.
In fact, based on the sword-verses (as well as countless other Koranic verses and oral traditions attributed to Muhammad), Islam's scholars, sheikhs, muftis, imams, and qadis throughout the ages have all reached the consensus—binding on the entire Muslim community—that Islam is to be at perpetual war with the non-Muslim world until the former subsumes the latter. (It is widely held by Muslim scholars that since the sword-verses are among the final revelations on the topic of Islam's relationship to non-Muslims, that they alone have abrogated some 200 of the Koran's earlier and more tolerant verses, such as "there is no coercion in religion" 2:256.) Famous Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, who is revered in the West for his "progressive" insights, also puts to rest the notion that jihad is "defensive" warfare:
In the Muslim community, the holy war [jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force...The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense... They are merely required to establish their religion among their own people. That is why the Israeilites after Moses and Joshua remained unconcerned with royal authority [e.g. a "caliphate"]. Their only concern was to establish their religion [not spread it to the nations]… But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations (The Muqudimmah, vol. 1 pg. 473).
Perhaps what is most unique about the sword-verses is the fact that when juxtaposed to their Old Testament counterparts, they are especially distinct for using language that transcends time and space, inciting believers to attack and slay non-believers today no less than yesterday. Yahweh commanded the Hebrews to kill Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites—all specific peoples rooted to a specific time and place. At no time did Yahweh give an open-ended command for the Hebrews, and by extension their descendants the Jews, to fight and kill gentiles. On the other hand, though Islam's original enemies were, like Judaism's, historical (e.g., Christian Byzantines and pagan Persians), the Koran rarely singles them out by their proper names. Instead, Muslims were (and are) commanded to fight the people of the book—"until they pay tribute with willing submission and feel themselves utterly subdued" (Koran 9:29) and to "slay the pagans wherever you find them" (Koran 9:5).
The two conjunctions "until" (hata) and "wherever" (haythu) demonstrate the perpetual and ubiquitous nature of these commandments: there are still "people of the book" who have yet to be "utterly subdued" (especially in the Americas, Europe, and Israel) and "pagans" to be slain "wherever" one looks (especially Asia and sub-Saharan Africa). In fact, the salient feature of almost all of the violent commandments in Islamic scriptures is their open-ended and generic nature: "Fight them [non-Muslims] until there is no more chaos and all religion belongs to Allah" (Koran 8:39). Also, in a well-attested tradition that appears in the most authentic hadith collections, Muhammad proclaims:
I have been commanded to wage war against mankind until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and that they establish prostration prayer, and pay the alms-tax [i.e., convert to Islam]. If they do so, their blood and property are protected [Sahih Muslim C9B1N31; also in Sahih Bukhari B2N24].
Aside from the divine words of the Koran, Muhammad's pattern of behavior—his "Sunna" or "example"—is an extremely important source of legislation in Islam. Muslims are exhorted to emulate Muhammad in all walks of life: "You have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern [of conduct]" (Koran 33:21). And Muhammad's pattern of conduct vis-à-vis non-Muslims is quite explicit. Sarcastically arguing against the concept of "moderate" Islam, terrorist Osama bin Laden, who enjoys half the Arab-Islamic world's support per an al-Jazeera poll, portrays the prophet's Sunna thus:
"Moderation" is demonstrated by our prophet who did not remain more than three months in Medina without raiding or sending a raiding party into the lands of the infidels to beat down their strongholds and seize their possessions, their lives, and their women" (from The Al-Qaeda Reader, page 56).
In fact, based on both the Koran and Muhammad's Sunna, pillaging and plundering infidels, enslaving their children, and placing their women in concubinage is well founded (e.g. 4:24, 4:92, 8:69, 24:33, 33:50, etc.). And the concept of "Sunna"—which is what 90% of the billion plus Muslims, the "Sunnis," are named after—essentially asserts that anything performed or approved by Muhammad and his early companions is applicable for Muslims today no less than yesterday. This does not mean that Muslims in mass are wild hedonists who live only to plunder and rape. But it does mean that those particular persons who are naturally inclined to such activities, and who also happen to be Muslim, can—and do—quite easily justify their actions by referring to the "Sunna of the Prophet"—the way al-Qaeda, for example, justifies its attacks on 9/11 where innocents, including women and children, were killed: Muhammad authorized his followers to use catapults during their siege of the town of Taif in 630 A.D., though he was aware that women and children were sheltered there. Also, when asked if it was permissible to launch night raids or set fire to the fortifications of the infidels if women and children were among them, the prophet is said to have responded, "They are from among them" (Sahih Muslim B19N4321).
While law-centric and legalistic, Judaism has no such equivalent to the Sunna; the words and deeds of the patriarchs, though recorded in the Old Testament, never went on to be part of Jewish law. Neither Abraham's "white-lies," nor Jacob's perfidy, nor Moses' short-fuse, nor David's adultery, nor Solomon's philandering ever went on to instruct Jews or Christians. They were merely understood to be historical actions perpetrated by fallible men who were often punished by God for their less than ideal behavior.
As for Christianity, much of the Old Testament law was abrogated by Jesus. "Eye for an eye" gave way to "turn the other cheek." Totally loving God and one's neighbor became supreme law (Matt 22:38-40). Furthermore, Jesus' "Sunna"—as in "What would Jesus do?"—is characterized by altruism. The New Testament contains absolutely no exhortations to violence. Still, there are some who strive to portray Jesus as having a similar militant ethos as Muhammad by quoting the verse where Jesus—who "spoke to the multitudes in parables and without a parable spoke not" (Matt 13:34)—said, "I come not to bring peace but a sword" (Matt 10:34). But based on the context of this statement, it is clear that Jesus was not commanding violence against non-Christians, but was predicting that strife will often exist between Christian converts and their environment—a prediction that was only too true as early Christians, far from taking up the sword, passively perished by the sword in martyrdom (as they still do today in many Muslim nations). At any rate, how can one honestly compare this one New Testament verse that metaphorically mentions the word "sword" to the literally hundreds of Koranic injunctions and statements by Muhammad that clearly command Muslims to take up a very real sword against non-Muslims?
And it is from here that one can best appreciate the Crusades. However one interprets these wars—as offensive or defensive, just or unjust—it is evident that they were not based on the "Sunna" of Jesus, who exhorted his followers to "love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you" (Matt 5:44).
In fact, far from suggesting anything intrinsic to Christianity, the Crusades ironically help better explain Islam. For what the Crusades demonstrated once and for all is that, irrespective of religious teachings—indeed, in the case of these so-called "Christian" Crusades, despite them—man is in fact predisposed to violence and intolerance. But this begs the question: If this is how Christians behaved—who are commanded to love, bless, and do good to their enemies who hate, curse, and persecute them—how much more can be expected of Muslims who, while sharing the same violent tendencies, are further validated by the Deity's command to attack, kill, and plunder non-believers?
To receive articles regularly by email, join the MEF News mailing list.
This text may be reposted so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

FaceBook links

I am now a part of Chris Logans network, ...from Islam In Action, as well as a few other prominent networks. From here, it is easier to be a part of some great networks such as Ali Sina, Robert Spencer and some other people whose work is admired and respected. Of course there are people who seems to be hagglers and sceptics of all sorts of things, but hey, we are all allowed to have our own opinions.
There is a group I joined....Muslims against sharia. Now I am hoping these people are genuine, and not practicing tagiyah. They do want to stop the violence etc, which is great. But I am yet to hear from them on whether they are happy to let people practice whatever religion they want to...in peace...or do they simply want peace - after everyone else has converted to islam.? Are they willing to be a part of the wider community? And share in all it does. I have been hearing from 'experts' who say there is no such thing as a moderate muslim. They are either muslim or not. If they believe in the koran then they revere old Mo. And I am afraid I can have no respect for anyone who follows this pedophile, raiding, raping, thief, madman, self-proclaimed prophet, or thinks he is the best thing since sliced bread.
I am willing to wait and find out where their true allegiances lie.

You can access my FB by following this link. Diane johnson

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/profile.php?id=1050993764&ref=profile


To view Christopher's profile or write on his Wall, follow this link:http://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=1481860912&mid=304e4eG3ea4e464G616643G1b



To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1481860912&k=5WA2Z6TX4X3M5BA1XK32WP&r

Islam In Action: Demoting Islam’s Religion Status

Islam In Action: Demoting Islam’s <em>Religion</em> Status

I urge everyone to read this excellent article. Thinking back to when Australia would not let notorious Gerry Adams from the IRA into Australia, I thought it was kind of strange at the time. I can't help but wonder though, that if he had of labelled his terrorist group as a religion then he would have been welcomed with open arms just like the devil spawn from iran Mohammad Khatami is welcomed here by Anglican Arch Bishop Philip Freier, the treasonous leftard, who has helped this ex-prez of Iran Mohammad Khatami to talk at Latrobe Uni THIS Thursday night, 7:15 at the Western Lecture Hall. Islam should be classified for what it is...a terrorist organisation..it is NOT a religion.

Victorian Islamic body tried to put a company out of business

Islamic council 'defamed halal firm for market monopoly'
Posted Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:17pm AEDT
Updated Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:16pm AEDT

A court has heard a Victorian Islamic body tried to put a company out of business so it could monopolise the certification of meat for consumption by Muslims.

The court heard the Islamic Co-ordinating Council of Victoria wanted a monopoly on certifying halal meat, an industry worth hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

A statement of claim filed with the court shows the council sent letters to a dozen abattoirs defaming a business called Aus-Halal that it believed was its competition.

It states the letter wrongly claimed that Aus-Halal was not certifying meat properly and was threatening exports to Muslim countries.

Abdul Ayan from Aus-Halal claims he was brought into hatred, contempt and ridicule because of the letters and his business suffered.

The hearing continues.

The Sound of Truth: Saudi Arabia:No women allowed

The Sound of Truth: Saudi Arabia:No women allowed


FFSake!!! The more I read articles like this one, the more I am left in utter disbelief at the women who continue to live under such oppression and fear. I can understand the feeble minded men taking a stance on the issue of women in the public arena...as they are so afraid the women will show them up for what they truly are...a pack of utter morons. Or they are afraid they will lose their brood mares and household slaves.
Just like in a marriage controlled by domestic violence...the psychopathic husband keeps the wife and kids in a state of fear by ruling with the total threat of violence, thus ensuring all his sicko needs are met with total obedience... I know one thing...when I was stuck in a violent marriage, I woke up one day and thought - NO MORE - the next time he threatened to hit me I calmly stated to him that: 'He had to sleep sooner or later.' He knew what I meant and No I did not get hit, and so he did not get his throat cut while he was asleep. That gave me the fortitude and the courage to pack up and leave. I was no longer afraid of him. Surely there are enough women to make a stand against this bullshit.
I am afraid I am fast running out of sympathy.
However, having said that I also understand that places that have come under sharia law...the women are not permitted to have ID cards and of course they would have no money, so they are essential stuck in the quagmire that is called islam.

Islam In Action: OZ:Muslim Gang Actor Jailed for Violence

Islam In Action: OZ:Muslim Gang Actor Jailed for Violence

Hmm, it's a wonder the Lebanese community are not jumping up and down over this movie....it might give a bad impression of them..they want to put a stop to anything or anyone that makes them look bad. No sense of humour these lebbos.

The Holy Bible and its preservation & Assembly of the quran

This article has cleared up so much of my confusions over why I keep reading of different versions that come from the koran. Now I know why, there are 4 + versions of it, compared to the Holy Bible and the ONE version. Gees, I wish these plagiarists would get it right....

Episode 29. Assembly of the quran

The author : Father Zakaria Boutros
The publisher: www.fatherzakaria.com


The Holy Bible and its preservation

From the beginning of the Holy Bible which is the Taurât written by Moses by the Holy revelation, it affirmed the preservation of the Holy Bible

In Deuteronomy 6:4 :” Hear, O Israel, the lord our God is one lord ,And you shall love the lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might, And these Words which I am commanding you today shall be on your heart, And you shall teach them to your sons, and shall speak of them as you sit in your house, and as you walk in the way, and as you are lying down, and as you are rising up, and you shall bind them for a sign on your hand; and they shall be for frontlets between your eyes, and you shall write them on the doorposts of your house, and on your gates”

In Deuteronomy 11:18:” Therefore you shall lay up these my words in your hearts, and in your souls, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, so that they may be as frontlets between your eyes”

In Deuteronomy 17:18:” And it shall be, when the king sits on the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself a copy of this Law in a book, from before the priests, the Levites”

That was how they were caring for the words of God

They were putting the Holy Books in special places in the temple and when they went into exile they hided them under the temple and when they returned back from exile, Ezra and Nehemiah got them out of it

The disciples wrote by the Holy Spirit the gospels and they were preserved in the churches

The quran itself attested for the Holy Bible, and it didn’t say about the Holy Bible a single word pointing to its falsification, not a single verse in the whole quran pointed to falsification of the Bible, On the contrary it said “Those to whom we gave the Scripture, they recognize it as they recognize their sons" The Cow chapter (Surat Al-Baqarah) 146, and the cattle chapter (Surat Al-An'am) 20 “

The Holy Bible in our hand nowadays is exactly the same as the ancient codices; there is no single alternation or change in it


Assembly of the quran:

There was four times in which the quran was assembled:

The first time was during the epoch of Muhammad: it was preserved in the chest of the companions, and parts of it were written on the leathery sheets, white stones, palm's sheets and ostrich bones

During the epoch of Muhammad, the quran was not written in a collective book till Muhammad died on the year 10A.H corresponding to 632 G

The first assembly of the quran was done during the epoch of Abe Baker , as many of the quran memorizers died in wars , Omer suggested to Abe Baker to assemble the quran in one book , as Omer noticed that most of the keepers of the quran were killed in the Muslim wars, especially the battle of Al-Yamamah , so Omer rushed to Abe Baker asking him to assemble the quran in one book lest loosing it completely

Abe Baker asked Zaied Ibn Thabet to assemble the quran, and it was assembled in the seven letters, or the seven different recitations

The quran was preserved with Abe Baker till he died, then with Omer after him till he was killed, and then it was with Hafsa the daughter of Omer, and it was the reference that Othman Ibn Affan referred to

After the death of Hafsa, Marawan Ibn Al-Hakam the governor of Al-Medina seized that quran, which was the original reference for the quran, as recited by Muhammad,

That quran was destroyed and mutilated by Marawan Ibn Al-Hakam and he demolished it completely

Those historical events were mentioned in the following references:

- Sahih Al-Bokhary, the conquest chapter, converse number 4000
- The proofs for the prophecy by Al-Bayhaqy, part 3, page 277
- The perfection in the quran’s sciences by Al-Syouty, part 1, page 60
- The qurans by Al-Sajistany

That was the first assembly of the quran in one book and it was destroyed, mutilated and completely demolished by Marawan Ibn Al-Hakam

- The most important assembly in history was done by Othman Ibn Affan, as Othman found that Muslims are fighting with each other because of the discrepancies of the seven recitations of the quran , so he commanded to reassemble the quran on year 25 A.H


- So the seven recitations of the quran were collected together, and they referred to the original quran of Abe Baker preserved with Hafsa before its destruction by Marawan Ibn Al-Hakam

- Othman found that there are seven different qurans, and people are fighting because of that multitude of qurans, so he burned six of the seven qurans and preserved only one

- How could he do that, it is a bizarre behavior, and a very serious issue

- The quran of Othman was devoid of speckling, and figuration

- Al-Sajistany mentioned that copies of that version of quran which was called the Imam Quran were sent to all Islamic capitals (1)

- The assembly of quran during the Amawian epoch

- As the Arabic alphabetical had no vowel letters, During the Amawian epoch, the Amawian people made a modified quran adjusted by figuration to avoid the mistakes of recitation, and the quran was renewed and modified

- The simplified Arabic encyclopedia mentioned that:” when there were lot of mistakes in the recitation of the quran, they assigned Nasser Ibn Asem to adjust it during the epoch of Al-Hajaj Ibn Yousef Al-Thaqafy on year 660- 714 G (2)

- That quran of Al-Hajaj Ibn Yousef Al-Thaqafy was depending on enormous unfamiliar verbalisms, and what corresponded to them from poetry, and a new quran emerged containing speckling, and figuration

- Al-Sajistany mentioned that Al-Hajaj changed 11 sites from the quran of Othman “(3)

- How the quran had such enormous change and alternations from time to time and it was mentioned that it was preserved in the preserved tablet before the beginning of time?
How it was destroyed? How it was falsified?

-The Iraqi quran was the original version currently circulating all over the world (4)

The number of Qurans:

Al-Sajistany (deceased on year 613 G) mentioned in his book that there were 26 different qurans existing among them: The quran of:

- Abe Bakre - Omer Ibn Al-Khatab
- Ali Ibn Abe-Taleb, - Obay Ibn Ka'b
- Abdullah Ibn Masoud - Abdullah Ibn Amre
- Anes Ibn Malek - Abdullah Ibn Abbas
- Abdullah Ibn Al-Zoubir - Aeisha the wife of the prophet
- Hafsa the wife of the prophet - Om Salma the wife of the prophet
- Obeid Ibn Omeir Al-Laithy - Ata' Ibn Abe Rabeh
- Akrama Maola Ibn Abbas - Salem Maola Abe Hozifa
- Moujahid Ibn Jabre - Saeed Bin Gabber
- Al-Asowad Ibn Yazid - Alkama ibn Kaies
- Muhammad Ibn Abe Mosa - Suleiman Ibn Mahran
- Abe Mosa Al-Asharee - Talha
- Al-Hajaj Ibn Yousef Al-Thaqafy - Hattan Ibn Abdullah

- Al-Sajistany mentioned that there were 1700 differences among them

- There is a book issued in Kuwait named: the dictionary of quran recitations, written by 2 eminent Islamic scholars :Dr: Abdul-Al Salem Makram and Dr: Ahmed Al-Mukhtar, the book was published by Dar Al-Salasel in Kuwait on 1982 G, in 6 volumes , It said: there was a big number of quran written till the epoch of Othman, who ordered to burn all the qurans those different from his official quran, like the quran of Abe Bakre, Obay Ibn Ka'b and others .
The book also said: there were 7 different ways of recitations of the quran; they differed in many aspects like articulation, replacement of a word by another and deletion of a word
While the quran is saying" It is we who have sent down the Dhikr (the Quran) and surely, we will guard it"
Some say that we have 4 bibles

Christians have one and the only Bible

The Bible is the joyful message for all mankind telling that God had loved them and set forth the salvation for the mankind

This only one bible was written by four of the Christ disciples, each one wrote the gospel for a specific category of people, as Matthew wrote the gospel to the Jewish announcing for them the Christ salvation , while Mark wrote to the Romans , Luke wrote the Greek and John wrote to all nations


(1“The qurans” by Al-Sajistany, page 7

(2) The simplified Arabic encyclopedia, page 690

(3) “The qurans” by Al-Sajistany, page 49

(4) The perfection in the quran’s sciences by Al-Syouty, page 351

The Reality of Islam. The Calumny of eating stool.

This is the reality of Islam and his two faces. How much we should be aware of what is happening around us.

The author : Father Zakaria Boutros
The publisher: www.fatherzakaria.com

Episode 89

The calumny of eating stool

The author : Father Zakaria Boutros
The publisher: www.fatherzakaria.com



Ahmed Didat wrote in his book "the accoutrement of fighting" page15, under the title: "Irrational superstitious in the Holy Bible" many criticisms of the Holy Bible, among them was "Eating stool and Drinking urine"

1- Didat quoted the utterance of Rabshakeh, who was the enemy's army commander (the commander of the kingdom of Assyria) threatening the people of God, and saying" Has my master sent me to your master, and to you, to speak these words? Hasn't he sent me to the men who sit on the wall, to eat their own dung, and to drink their own urine with you?' in (2 kings 18:27) and also in (Isaiah 36:12)

2- Didat didn't comment on that quotation by any word to purport the credulous Muslims that the Holy Bible is inciting on eating stool and drinking urine!!!

3- Actually it is very obvious to any primary school child that those were the words of the commander of the enemy's army threatening the people of God, and not at all the Holy Bible inciting on eating stool and drinking urine as he said

4- By that it is very obvious the roguery of that proselytiser who was the king of deceitfulness for long period of time

5- Actually by that deception, he wanted to cover for a scandal in the prophetical converses

That scandal was mentioned in Sahih Al-Bokhary : Narrated Anas Ibn malek: some people were very sick, the prophet told them to go to his shepherds and drink from the camel's milk and urine, so they went and drank from the camel's milk and urine , and they were cured, then they killed the Shepherds , stole the camels and fled away, the prophet knew about that , he send people after them , they brought them to him , he cut their hands and legs, and pierced their eyes ( burned them with hot nails) and they were biting the ground from the intense pain, and died in the desert (1)

Apart from discussing how pity was the messenger of mercy, that converse said that the messenger commanded them to drink from the camel's urine

So Didat probably wanted to cover for that scandal by attaching similar accusation to the Holy Bible, benefiting from his credulous readers, who are not seeking the facts

So, what would be the reputation of that man after the disclosure of that bluff???
In his book "the accoutrement of fighting" page15, Didat quoted some verses from the book of Ezekiel, and put them under the title" eating cakes cooked on the stool"

1- We will put those verses to disclose the deceitfulness of that respectful proselytiser,

Ezekiel 4:12, 13:" You shall eat it as barley cakes, and you shall bake it in their sight with dung that comes out of man. The lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their bread unclean, among the nations where I will drive them"

2- As usual Didat mentioned the title of those verses without commenting on them by any word, to purport the credulous that the Holy Bible is inciting on eating the stool that was never said by the Holy Bible at all

3- Don't they cook the bead in the rural areas on the dung of beasts? , so does it mean that they are eating the dung of beasts

4- What does Didat say about using the human and animal dung as plant fertilizer, does that mean that the dung was eaten?

5- Then look to the difference between the nice expression used by the Holy Bible" dung" and the fallen impolite expression "stool" used by Didat

6- That difference is obvious between many expressions of the Holy Bible and those of the quran, as for the word "marriage", the quran names it" wedlock"

7-The most important point is the purpose behind that commandment of the lord

8- The translator himself mentioned" the lord said:" Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their bread unclean, among the nations where I will drive them"

9- So that was a rebuke for the Jewish and a threatening for them, as they will eat unclean bread, so the lord's commandment to Ezekiel was to bake that bread professedly in front of the people

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Didat mentioned also that: in the Holy Bible pages, Samson committed adultery with a prostitute in Gaza


1- First the Holy Bible didn't mention that story as a good deed to be followed by the people, but he mentioned the sin of Samson being a human, and the Holy Bible said: "They have all turned aside. They have together become unprofitable. There is no one who does good, not so much as one." And even the prophets are not infallibles

2- Samson had a recompense for his awful sin, as they pierced his eyes and he was dragging the mill as an animal, it was written in the Holy Bible:" But man, despite his riches, doesn't endure. He is like the animals that perish"
3- We mentioned before about the prophets' sins mentioned by the quran as:

4- Abraham 'sin: in Abraham chapter (Surat Ibrahim) 41 he said:" Our Lord! Forgive me and my parents, and all the believers on the Day when the reckoning will be established."

5- Moses' sin: in The Narration chapter (Surah Al-Qasas) 15, 16:" And he entered the city at a time of unawareness of its people, and he found there two men fighting, - one of his party, and the other of his foes. The man of his own party asked him for help against his foe, so Moses struck him with his fist and killed him. He said: "This is of Satan doing, verily, he is a plain misleading enemy." he said: "My Lord! Verily, I have wronged myself, so forgive me." Then He forgave him. Verily, He is the Oft-Forgiving, the Most Merciful"

6- Also Muhammad said: in Victory chapter (Surat Al-Fath) 2:"That Allah may forgive you your sins of the past and the future"

And in the Opening Forth chapter (Surat Ash-Sharh) 1- 3:" Have we not opened your breast for you and removed from you your burden, which weighed down your back?


Did Didat mention Samson's sin to justify what Muhammad had done on the bed of his wife Hafsa Bent Omer?
- That was mentioned in the exegesis of Ibn Kathir for the first verse of the Prohibition chapter (Surat At-Tahrim) 1:" O Prophet! Why do you ban for yourself who Allah has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives? And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful"
-That was mentioned also (on the internet) by Al-Wahedy Al-Nisabory in the reasons of descend of that verse
- Also it was mentioned by Al-Bayhaquey in his Sonan (on the internet), in the book of divorce and dismantling, he summarized that flagrant story saying:" narrated Al-Dahak that Hafsa, the mother of believers one day visited her father, and it was her turn for the prophet to be with her, he came to her house, and he didn't find her , so he sent for his handmaid Maria the Copt, he slept with her in the house of Hafsa , when Hafsa came back she found him doing that, and she said: O messenger of God, do you perform that in my house and on my day? He said: I swear that from now onwards, Maria is unlawful for me, but don't tell anybody, but she went out telling Aeisha, then God descended in his book:" O Prophet! Why do you ban for yourself who Allah has made lawful to you", so he was ordered to expiate his oath (and not his deed) and to return back his handmaid
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Didat mentioned in page 16 of his book that Ruth went to Boaz to wedlock her by night as instructed by her mother in-law
1-Didat vouched by the verse, and as usual he cut the utterance from its contexture, as the verse he mentioned himself said: "he will tell you what you shall do."(Ruth 3:4) and not as he said "to wedlock her"
That is the way he used to bluff people by that deceitful utterances

2- Probably Didat mentioned that story to cover for the disgraceful pleasure marriage that Mohammed ordered his companions to do, as mentioned in:

The woman chapter (Surat An-Nisa') 24:" those, of whom you have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their wages"

3- Narrated Omran Ibn Faisel:" the verse of pleasure came in the book of God , so we did have pleasure with the messenger of God ,and no other verse came to ban it ,and the messenger didn't forbid us to do so till he died"(2)

4- Narrated Kais:" I heard Abdullah saying: we were with the prophet (during one of the incursions), we asked him shall we refrain from women here, he said: No, and he allowed us to wedlock the woman for a period of time, and to give her the wage of that pleasure even our cloth" (3)

5- Narrated Kais:" I heard Abdullah saying: we were with the prophet (during one of the incursions), we had no women, we said: shall we refrain from women, messenger of God? He allowed us to wedlock the woman by even our cloth for a limited period of time (meaning a temporary marriage) (4)

We are asking is there any difference between that and the prostitution?

By mentioning that Didat was probably covering for a more disgraceful scandal, that is what Muhammad did concerning the women of the militants

1- It was mentioned that the messenger of God, in the army's way back from Khaiber incursion, had commanded his announcer to announce for everybody: don't knock the doors of your houses with your women inside", but two men hurried up and rushed into their houses, they found men with their wives (5)

2- How would Didat explain that utterance of the prophet, with his logic??

3- Was that the reason why Didat mentioned his calumnies regarding the Holy Bible, to cover for those disgraceful stories?

It is just a question; we wish to get an answer for it from one of the respectable jurisprudents

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In his book "the accoutrement of fighting" page16. Ahmed Didat mentioned that:" David slept with a small girl in his bed

1-We wander from the forgery of facts committed by that proselytiser

2- Here is the text that he quoted from the Holy Bible in (1 kings 1: 1- 4)" Now king David was old and stricken in years; and they covered him with clothes, but he got no heat.
Therefore his servants said to him, Let there be sought for my lord the king a young virgin: and let her stand before the king, and cherish him; and let her lie in your bosom, that my lord the king may keep warm. So they sought for a beautiful young lady throughout all the borders of Israel, and found Abishag the Shunammite, and brought her to the king. The young lady was very beautiful; and she cherished the king, and ministered to him; but the king didn't know her intimately"

3- The forgery performed by that proselytiser was very obvious, as he didn't complete the verses (like: approach not the prayer….)

4- So he cut the last part and didn't complete the phrase:" but the king didn't know her intimately", that part is rebutting his flagrant forgery claiming that David slept with her

5- The bigger calumny was his saying that she was a small girl, while the Holy Bible didn't say that but said: a virgin, and not a small girl

6- Certainly Didat mentioned that to cover for a big disaster, and a disgraceful scandal for every Muslim

That scandal and disaster was Muhammad's marriage to Aeisha

1- Narrated Sofyian, from Hesham, from his father, from Aeisha , that the prophet engaged her, while she was six years old, and married her while she was nine years old , and she was with him nine years (6)

2- When he engaged her he was 51 years and when he married her he was 54 years old

- Some said that she was adolescent at that age, as girls at that time were getting adolescent early

Actually whoever is saying that is definitely ignorant in the Islamic Books.

Those saying that should listen to the utterance of Fath Al-Bare saying that the converse of Aeisha regarding espousing her by Abe Baker came while she didn't yet reach the pubescence….for that reason he mentioned that converse of Aeisha, Al-Muhaleb said: there was a consensus that it is permissible for the father to espouse his young firstborn daughter, even if she could not be married (7)

- Some others said that marrying young girls was a people's custom at those old days

1- If people were used to do eccentric things, especially marrying young girls, so that supposed to be a prophet should not imitate them, but he should rather rectify their eccentricity, and the utterance of Fath Al-Bare negated that claim as he said: the marriage of the prophet from Aeisha, while she was 6 years old was among his characteristics (7)

2- Neither Didat nor any other one could distort the life of Prophet David, to cover for the scandal of marriage of the child Aeisha

(1) Sahih Al-Bokhary , converse number 5686

(2) Sahih Al-Bokhary part 3, page 71

(3) Sahih Al-Bokhary part 3, page 84

(4) Sahih Muslim, part 4, page 130

(5) "The Beginning and the end" by Ibn Kathir, part 4, page 219
And "Eyes of the news" by Ibn Katiba, part 1, page 218

(6) Sahih Al-Bokhary, converse number 5188

(7) Fath Al-Bare in the exegesis of Sahih Al-Bokhary, (39- Chapter of" the man espousing
His young children)



Permission to share all of Father Zakararias' writings is given on his website, through God's Love.

Father Zakararias on the pervert Mo.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.