Sunday, March 29, 2009

Intolerant Islam Wants to Ban Letter 'X'

I was reading some REVIEWS on books I would like to purchase over at AMAZON. One in particular…The Truth about Mohhamad, by Ali Sina. Then I came across this FORUM on the following story.

What a bloody joke. Only I am NOT laughing. Do we tell them what to do with their little squiggles in arabic. Could you imagine if these nutcases were to be assessed by a psychologist and shown the flash cards? What would they make of an ink-blot. Oh yeah, they would want that banned too. To me it looks like a picture of mo all distorted. They would take offence and so want it not to be in the testing.

Should they also ban the letter T / t - as it could be construed as a symbol of a cross. More so than the letter X. Or the letter B for looking like a pair of boobs side on? What are these jerks really trying to accomplish? To me, I use the letter xxxx to throw kisses to whoever I might be writing to.
Have a read of the story and some of the comments, they are seriously crackers.
Intolerant Islam Wants to Ban Letter 'X'

This article from the New York Sun tells how the Saudi Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice wants to ban the letter 'X' because it looks too much like a cross.

Part of one of the quotes.

'The truth is as Robert Spencer said, Islam is the world's most intolerant religion. I think even he didn't think that they were so nutty and intolerant as to discuss getting rid of a letter. Next, what will happen to the '+' sign?'

The more I hear of islam, the more I read of islam, the more bloody angry I become. When are people really going to wake up and start shouting from the rooftops about this 'cancer on humanity'. We, know the cure, but we just have to convince the authorities to fund it.

Give Me A Break.


I think it is time for us people living in Victoria, (or even in Australia), to arrange for some sort of get-together to form some type of group, whether it be just a group to organise strategies, forums, protests, or simply for support.... In my case, you are all I have in the way of support.

Gifts for the hard to buy for person

Yazzii Wildlife Collection: A new concept for Jewellery, Make-up and Cosmetic Storage. (Link is in the side bar)and I have also given her a wrap at my other blog BUTTERFLY HAVEN

This is a first for me. I was at Water Gardens Shopping Centre yesterday ( Thursday 26th March) just to have some lunch with my niece. As we were wandering around we came across a display of some wonderful looking items. We were looking at them and remarking on the practicality and quality of these products. I immediately thought of my other niece in Perth. Now she travels interstate on a fairly regular basis either for family reasons or business, she also travels to places in WA for short stays. Ah ha! I thought. Now she wears a lot of very nice and rather expensive jewellery, and I am always at a loss as to what to buy for her in the way of gifts.
So we got talking to the owner of this display, her name is Yazzii. We asked quite a few questions on her products and about her business and I was impressed that she supplies to many places around the world as a distributor.
Now, this display made a very nice change to the various shops that sell cheap jewellery, make-up bags and travel bags etc, and I had never seen her products displayed anywhere. This is because she has not displayed in this way before. She does distribute to specialty shops but not in this area. She has …I think from memory around 180 staff.
In the past I have ordered many, many various items from catalogues or online and rarely have I been 100% satisfied with them, especially the material of, say, T-shirts or bags. They never look as good as they do in the catalogues, and the quality of the material is such that I would never recommend them to others.
However, having seen these products, inspected the stitching on them, I was impressed at the quality. They are like quilting. Yazzii was telling me that she does expos at the Showgrounds in Ascot Vale, at Jeff’s Shed and Quilting Fairs. I went to a Quilting Fair 2 years ago but not this year when she was there.
Yazzii was selling these products at a cheaper rate than what can be purchased on line, or even in boutiques she distributes to, and had many ‘teasers’ as she called some of the products in the jewellery range . She also had a range of gorgeous other products.

I asked how long she would have her display there, and she told me for one more week. I tossed it around in my head and I really wanted to purchase one of these products for my niece. I didn’t think I would be able to get back there in time or even have the $’s so I decided then and there to purchase what I wanted. I would have liked to get a slightly bigger organiser for my niece, but then I had to think of my budget, and also of the amount of space she would have in her suitcase. So I went for the middle size zip up bag with quite a few separate compartments and a special ring holder.
My companion also purchased something for herself. Gee, I saw some stuff I would have loved to have bought, but I didn’t have enough money, nor would I in the future….my budget is tight.
Anyway, I asked Yazzii if I could write a piece about her products. She said ‘yes please.’
There were some particular items I really wanted to look at more closely, but I know me, and I would have not been able to help myself, I would have blown the rest of my money, plus I would have ended up owing my companion (again). I don’t know the proper name for it but it was a wrap of sorts, and I love this type of clothing, as I collect scarves and capes etc.
I have not yet visited her site, as I did not want to be influenced by anything she has on it. I wanted to write about it from my memory and my thoughts first.
There were so many things in this display and various materials and colours.
I must mention about the prices. For these products, the prices were most reasonable, and I was happy with them. So happy in fact, that I just know this first purchase will not be my one and only.

So if you are looking for a unique gift for that hard to buy person in your life, then go and have a look at these products…I am sure you will find something. Yazzii has buyers from all over the world. She has told me that her products are made in INDIA but supervised by her.

Her details are: yazzii website:

Tel No: (03) 9899-9990
Fax: (03) 8610-0027
Showroom Address: Trade Only. Unit 4, 10 Clarice Road, Box Hill South, Victoria 3128

Islam In Action: UK:Police Identify 200 Children as Potential Terrorists

Islam In Action: UK:Police Identify 200 Children as Potential Terrorists

Only 200....
That’s all very well and good, but please, as if one of these kids parents are going to allow intervention. Now, what are the Police going to do about the parents if they are full on muzzos, who adore their scummy prophet and are all for the islamisation of the UK? And what pray tell are the Police to do about the Western kids being indoctrinated by the friends who are little islamists? And the adult converts?
Wouldn’t it be better for the Police to concentrate of enforcing law and order in the communities, and making sure that the muzzos are well watched.
If the imams are preaching hate in their mosques, which to me, are just a gathering place for them to decide on more strategies to gain more concessions from us infidels, and ways they can bring charges against us for insulting their pedophile prophet, then shouldn’t these places be policed in depth?
If I was a church going person, and went to a service where the Pastor or whatever was preaching hate against the muslims, how long do you think they would get away with that? It would be a one time event only.

"We are committed to stopping people becoming or supporting terrorists or violent extremists. The aim of the Channel project is to directly support vulnerable people by providing supportive interventions when families, communities and networks raise concerns about their behaviour."

The only way they are going to stop people becoming or supporting terrorists is to deport those muzzos who are spreading their hate and committing crimes. Even invalidating and stripping them and their families of their citizenship papers. First plane out of there, all expenses paid. It will be cheaper in the long run.
Now all we need to do is convince the Aussie pollies to wake up and stop muslim immigration, and as for the boat people, afganis & pakis…10 in the last year alone,
Either blow their boats out of the water, forbid any naval vessels from picking them up, thus allowing them to claim refugee status, or get them on the first plane back to their countries. Mr. Howard had it right, and there was almost no boats coming illegally to our shores. Since Rudd has been in power, there have been many of them.

BTW, the muzzos are forming their own communities here as well. I believe there is one up North established by a convert who was a pugilist. I have no ideas where the others are, as they are not advertised or reported in the news here, but Australia has vast amounts of Forrest and desert areas, and bush land where communities could easily be set up. Other than that they just take over the suburbs and build their mosques and schools no matter how many people complain or lodge protests with the council concerned.

I don’t know about you and your readers Chris, but to me, we are losing ‘the battle’ and I can’t see any winning scores on our part until it is too late then people will remove their blinkers and say, “why wasn’t I told?” Then I will have the pleasure in saying “I told you so”. The silence among my family members and associates is deafening, and they have made it clear to me they are not interested in my theories or racist remarks, and it won’t happen here type of thing. They have also made it clear that; they do not have the time or the inclination to look at any links or stories/articles I send them about anything to do with islam etc. It does sadden me, and the only one I am getting through to is my daughter, and that is on the banking issue.
So I will just keep learning and stay within my networks here on the net and FB and Bloggs etc, and I will keep reading the news articles I find, books & DVD’s that are recommended, and pray that when the time comes, that my family stay safe.

Bring on the Crusades…BEAUSEANT!!!
Christian Nanna

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Tuberculosis on the rise - again.

Now this subject made me shudder. Why, you might ask??? Because I know what it is like to have this rotten bloody disease. I was found to have it when I was 4 years old. I apparently got it from family members who had been in the wars.
As the youngest of 5 children, and born to parents who were in their late 30's, I was just seen as a sickly kid who always had a cold. It wasn't even picked up with all the bloody noses I would have and vomit up blood through the night. My parents just thought as I often had nose bleeds, that it would happen in my sleep, thus swallowing the blood and vomit it up. (Gross yeah).. It was however, picked up when my parent's bedroom walls were covered in blood clots from my projectile vomiting in the middle of the night. This was the beginning of my next year and a half in hospital, isolated from my family. My sisters would have to wave to me through the ward window. The treatment was totally gross back then. Tubes down my throat, up my nose, injections all the time, pills that would choke a bloody horse. After the first year and my 5th birthday in hospital, I would gradually be allowed to have some weekend visits home, then when I was released from the hospital I was confined to bed rest and light activity and huge tins of horse choking pills. I remember in the 1980's there were a few cases of TB detected in Victoria, well I can tell you, I was at the TB Clinic getting X-Rays quick smart.. I was terrified of ever getting it again. Australia used to have compulsory vaccinations for this. TB was eventually eradicated from our vocabulary and hospitals resulting in no more compulsory testing or vaccinations.
Now if our Immigration Policy is such that they are going to be letting infected people in this country without the proper screenings, and especially all the African migrants/refugees etc. Then surely we need to be doing something about re-introducing screenings and vaccinations against this horrible disease.

How about refusing entry to anyone with any type of infectious disease. That would suit me perfectly!!!!!

Resurgent Tuberculosis Deadly Disease of Globalization
by Christine Craig
BIOLOGY & MEDICINE 21st CENTURY Science & Technology Spring/Summer 2007 73

Two epidemiological reports released in the last few months on the extent of extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in South Africa, are critical warnings of the global threat of this virtually incurable disease, especially in conjunction with its “companion” ailment, HIV/AIDS.
TB in any form is not some rare, exotic ailment, but an illness whose onset and transmissibility have long
been understood. With decent infrastructure and living conditions, TB could have been contained and driven
back to almost nil incidence. However, with the last three decades of international decline in economic conditions, affecting concentrations of people in Africa and Asia, and in localized areas in the Americas and Europe, the resurgence of TB, with its deadly mutations, was predictable.1
On Sept. 16, 2006, the Department of Health for South Africa issued a horrifying report on the presence of XDR-TB,2 including the situation in KwaZulu- Natal. Certain patients at the Church of Scotland Hospital in Tugela Ferry were found, in the Fall of 2005, to be infected with a strain of TB not responding to any
treatment. A survey over the following 12 months, turned up 53 patients, almost all co-infected with HIV, who
were suffering from untreatable TB which, in the immune-compromised patients, was quickly fatal. All but one of the 53 died within three weeks of diagnosis. Those 53 victims represented 16 percent of all confirmed cases of XDRTB globally during 2006. This bombshell report conjured up images of a catastrophe in the making in the AIDS-wracked areas of South Africa, precipitating a flurry of meetings among
international health professionals, and leading to the creation of the World Health Organization (WHO) Global XDR-TB Task Force, which convened in October to address the threat of untreatable TB in the age of HIV. The Global XDR-TB Task Force found, to its horror (but no great surprise) that, in the renewed war against a strengthening foe, the ammunition was low, and the supply lines were cut. Although warnings had been out since the early 1990s that multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB was a rising threat, as evidenced by
the well-documented outbreaks in the United States and in Eastern Europe during the late 1980s, no agencies had really taken it seriously as a global danger at the time.
XDR-TB is now considered endemic in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. In the January 2007 issue of PLoS Medicine, J.A. Singh et al. presented a truly frightening view of the situation.
More than 30 new cases are detected each month, with a total of more than 300 cases, and the disease has been reported in 39 hospitals, plus other areas of the province. And that is just the official tally, which most certainly understates the case, as many of the poor never seek medical help. The authors note: “In recognition of the global threat posed by these factors, on September 9, 2006, WHO urged a
response to the outbreak akin to recent global efforts to control severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the bird flu....”

Europe’s White Plague
That the Western world would be so shocked and surprised by this turn of events is remarkable in itself, considering that, just two centuries ago, tuberculosis was so virulent in Europe that many 72 Spring/Summer 2007 21st CENTURY Science & Technology BIOLOGY & MEDICINE feared it would destroy Western civilization. The list of artists, philosophers, and scientists who suffered or died from TB is endless, including
Friedrich Schiller, Percy Shelley, Bernhard Riemann, John Keats, and Vladimir Vernadsky.
It is estimated that in 1800, the death rate per year from tuberculosis in Western Europe (and in urban North America) was 1 percent. At the peak of the long epidemic, perhaps 25 percent of Western Europeans
died of tuberculosis. There was no cure for the disease, nor was the causative agent known at that time.
And yet, over the next two centuries, “consumption” (as it was known) lost its grip on the European continent, slowly and steadily receding, even in the absence of any satisfactory medical treatments for the disease. Those with active disease were still very likely to die, but fewer were getting active disease.
It has been just 125 years since the famed bacteriologist and Göttingen-trained physician Robert Koch identified and characterized the minuscule tuberculosis bacillus in his home laboratory in Berlin, in 1881, proving it to be the source of the disease, and giving hope that the TB leviathan then devouring the
European populace, could be brought down by science.

It has been almost 100 years since the discovery of the only vaccine ever developed against tuberculosis—the Bacille Calmette Guèrin (BCG) vaccine, based on a highly attenuated Mycobacterium bovis strain—a vaccine found to give some protection to children against the gruesome childhood killers, miliary tuberculosis and tubercular meningitis. It has been only some 60 years since the development of the first effective antibiotics against tuberculosis: streptomycin and para-amino salicylic acid (PAS), discovered by Selman Waksman and Jorgen Lehmann, respectively, around the end of World War II.

By 1960, a team led by Dr. John Crofton of Edinburgh, had successfully tackled the recalcitrant tuberculosis problem in Scotland with a remarkable protocol using triple-antibiotic therapy in an 18-month-long treatment regimen, which could successfully cure even advanced pulmonary tuberculosis cases caused by drug-resistant strains. And, under the joint control of the British Medical Research Council and the WHO, trials of Crofton’s methods had been carried out in Madras, India among the poor—with astounding success. Policy makers, including scientists, began to believe that TB could be tackled by drug technology alone, even without costly investments in economic development and public health infrastructure! A mere five years later, tuberculosis had already been dropped from courses at the Harvard School of Public Health, a disease deemed no longer important in the training of future health-care professionals. Science had won, and tuberculosis, long the scourge of Europe and the U.S., receded from the consciousness of the populace (Figure 1).

The world didn’t really take notice of tuberculosis again as a global problem until the second half of the 1980s, when the long trend of TB incidence- decrease in developed countries was shattered by a sudden upward tick in notifications, noted most strongly in the United States and in post- Soviet Eastern Europe. The situation was documented in great detail in the United States by outraged public health professionals, especially in New York City, where most of the increase was occurring (Figure 2).3

The Nature of the Beast
Tuberculosis is usually caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an ingenious and insidious organism: a minuscule bacterium hardly bigger than a virus, surrounded by an impervious waxy coat. In many of its features within the host body it acts similarly to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), secreting
itself within immune cells called phagocytes, the very cells that would otherwise seek it out and destroy it.
Within the phagocyte, the tubercular bacillus hides in the central vacuole, protected from chemical destruction by its waxy coat. Here it grows and reproduces very slowly, and is spread with the phagocytes throughout the lymphatic system. Most often, the disease affects adults in its pulmonary form. Children are often afflicted with primary infections affecting the lymphatic system or other organs, including a rapidly fatal systemic form called military tuberculosis. During the host’s first (primary) infection with TB, a battle with the immune system ensues, and, almost always, the immune system wins, at least in the short term. The infection becomes “latent.”

This is a partial pdf of the article. To purchase the entire issue, please use the link below:

DDT and over-population.

Here is a very interesting article about DDT, population explosion and the Political reasons behind it all.

I have only ever heard of DDT as one of the most dangerous and deadly chemicals ever made. It is banned here in OZ, but after reading this article, I once again see how politics and PC can get in the way of common sense. What really grabbed my attention was a paragraph of the banning of DDT was the blame for a population explosion in 3rd world countries. Now, far from me having a scientific mind, but is this not something that could once again get diseases like malaria under some control and so save many thousands of lives from dying horrible deaths. I mean to say, many people in 3rd world countries live in absolute poverty and diseased beyond help.
Or this just one more huge piece of propaganda for the Democratic socialists run by LaRouche who was the/is the king pin behind Soros, or the other way around. In a previous comment I had mentioned my mind could not recall certain names associated with Soros, but as soon as I saw this article I knew where the connections in my memory banks were going.
But back to the question of do we really need DDT back on the agenda to save lives, from horrible mosquito borne diseases etc? To grow crops to feed people? In a world over nearing over-population, and I say that because I believe there are too many people for this world to sustain in a livable manner. Just my opinion. What do you think?

This was a link from AIM, to a Science blog.

Bring Back DDT, and Science With It!
By Marjorie Mazel Hecht
Excerpt of Editorial from Summer 2002 issue

The 1972 U.S. ban on DDT is responsible for a genocide 10 times larger than that for which we sent Nazis to the gallows at Nuremberg. It is also responsible for a menticide which has already condemned one entire generation to a dark age of anti-science ignorance, and is now infecting a new one.
The lies and hysteria spread to defend the DDT ban are typical of the irrationalist, anti-science wave which has virtually destroyed rational forms of discourse in our society. If you want to save science—and human lives—the fight to bring back DDT, now being championed by that very electable candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., had better be at the top of your agenda.
Sixty million people have died needlessly of malaria, since the imposition of the 1972 ban on DDT, and hundreds of millions more have suffered from this debilitating disease. The majority of those affected are children. Of the 300 to 500 million new cases of malaria each year, 200 to 300 million are children, and malaria now kills one child every 30 seconds. Ninety percent of the reported cases of malaria are in Africa, and 40 percent of the world’s population, inhabitants of tropical countries, are threatened by the increasing incidence of malaria.
The DDT ban does not only affect tropical nations. In the wake of the DDT ban, the United States stopped its mosquito control programs, cutting the budgets for mosquito control and monitoring. Exactly as scientists had warned 25 years ago, we are now facing increases of mosquito-borne killer diseases—West Nile fever and dengue, to name the most prominent.
What DDT Can Do
Malaria is a preventable mosquito-borne disease. It can be controlled by spraying a tiny amount of DDT on the walls of houses twice a year. DDT is cheaper than other pesticides, more effective, and not harmful to human beings or animals.
Even where mosquito populations have developed resistance to DDT, it is more effective (and less problematic) than alternative chemicals. The reason is that mosquitoes are repelled by the DDT on house walls and do not stay around to bite and infect the inhabitants. This effect is known as “excito-repellency,” and has been shown to be a dominant way that DDT controls malaria-bearing mosquitoes, in addition to killing them on contact.1 Studies have demonstrated this for all major species of malaria-bearing mosquitoes.
It costs only $1.44 per year to spray one house with DDT. The more toxic substitutes cost as much as 10 to 20 times more and require more frequent applications, making spraying programs prohibitively expensive. In addition, replacement pesticides have to be applied more frequently and are more toxic.
Banned to Kill People
DDT came into use during World War II, and in a very short time saved more lives and prevented more diseases than any other man-made chemical in history. Millions of troops and civilians, in particular war refugees, were saved from typhus because one DDT dusting killed the body lice that spread that dread disease.
Why was DDT banned, 30 years after its World War II introduction and spectacular success in saving lives? The reason was stated bluntly by Alexander King, founder of the Malthusian Club of Rome, who wrote in a biographical essay in 1990, “My chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is that it has greatly added to the population problem.” King was particularly concerned that DDT had dramatically cut the death rates in the developing sector, and thus increased population growth.
As King correctly observed, the incidence of malaria, and its death rates, were vastly reduced by DDT spraying. To take one example: Sri Lanka (Ceylon) had 2.8 million cases of malaria and more than 12,500 deaths in 1946, before the use of DDT. In 1963, after a large-scale spraying campaign, the number of cases fell to 17, and the number of deaths fell to 1. But five years after the stop of spraying, in 1969, the number of deaths had climbed to 113, and the number of cases to 500,000. Today, malaria rates have soared in countries that stopped spraying. In South Africa, the malaria incidence increased by 1,000 percent in the late 1990s.
The Silent Spring Fraud
The campaign to ban DDT got its start with the publication of Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring in 1962. Carson’s popular book was a fraud. She played on people’s emotions, and to do so, she selected and falsified data from scientific studies, as entomologist Dr. J. Gordon Edwards has documented in his analysis of the original scientific studies that Carson cited.2
As a result of the propaganda and lies, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency convened scientific hearings and appointed a Hearing Examiner, Edmund Sweeney, to run them. Every major scientific organization in the world supported DDT use, submitted testimony, as did the environmentalist opposition. The hearings went on for seven months, and generated 9,000 pages of testimony. Hearing Examiner Sweeney then ruled that DDT should not be banned, based on the scientific evidence: “DDT is not carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic to man [and] these uses of DDT do not have a deleterious effect on fish, birds, wildlife, or estuarine organisms,” Sweeney concluded.
Two months later, without even reading the testimony or attending the hearings, EPA administrator William Ruckelshaus overruled the EPA hearing officer and banned DDT. He later admitted that he made the decision for “political” reasons. “Science, along with economics, has a role to play . .. .. [but] the ultimate decision remains political,” Ruckelshaus said.
The U.S. decision had a rapid effect in the developing sector, where the State Department made U.S. aid contingent on countries not using any pesticide that was banned in the United States. The U.S. Agency for International Development discontinued its support for DDT spraying programs, and instead increased funding for birth control programs.
Other Western nations—Sweden and Norway, for example—also pressured recipient nations to stop the use of DDT. Belize abandoned DDT in 1999, because Mexico, under pressure from the United States and NAFTA, had stopped the manufacture of DDT, which was Belize’s source. Purchases of replacement insecticides would take up nearly 90 percent of Belize’s malaria control budget. Mozambique stopped the use of DDT, “because 80 percent of the country’s health budget came from donor funds, and donors refused to allow the use of DDT,” reported the British Medical Journal (March 11, 2000).
The World Bank and the World Health Organization, meanwhile, responded to the rise in malaria incidence with a well-publicized “Roll Back Malaria” program, begun in 1989, which involves no insect control measures, only bed nets, personnel training, and drug therapies—a prescription for failure.
POPs Convention Is Genocide
In 1995, despite the official documentation of increases in malaria cases and malaria deaths, the United Nations Environment Program began an effort to make the ban on DDT worldwide. UNEP proposed to institute “legally binding” international controls banning what are called “persistent organic pollutants” or POPs, including DDT. Ratification of the POPs Convention, finalized in 2001, is now pending in the U.S. Senate, where it has the support of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, including committee chairman James Jeffords (Ind.-Vt.) and committee member Joe Lieberman (D.-Conn.). President Bush has already endorsed the U.S. signing on to the POPs Convention.
The evidence of DDT’s effectiveness is dramatic. In South America, where malaria is endemic, malaria rates soared in countries that had stopped spraying houses with DDT after 1993: Guyana, Bolivia, Paraguay, Peru, Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela. In Ecuador, however, which increased its use of DDT after 1993, the malaria rate was rapidly reduced by 60 percent.
But DDT spraying is not a magic bullet cure-all. Eliminating mosquito-borne diseases here and around the world requires in-depth public health infrastructure and trained personnel—as were in place in the 1950s and 1960s, when DDT began to rid the world of malaria. And mosquito-borne illness is not the only scourge now threatening us. A growing AIDS pandemic, and the return of tuberculosis and other killer diseases, now also menace growing parts of the world’s population, particularly in those areas where human immune systems are challenged by malnutrition and poorly developed (or nonexistent) water and sanitation systems.
To solve this worsening problem as a whole—a disgrace in face of the scientific achievements the world has made—we must reverse the entire course of the past 30 years’ policymaking and return to a society based on production, scientific progress, and rationality. The onrushing world depression crisis, demands a new FDR-style approach to economic reconstruction in the United States. The recognized spokesman for such a reform of our economic and monetary policies is the very electable candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Lyndon H. LaRouche.
The United States should not ratify the POPs Convention with its phase-out of DDT and other valuable chemicals. On the contrary, this nation should bring back DDT now, under the provisions of existing U.S. law that allow the use of DDT in health emergencies. If the continuing mass murder of millions of people is not an emergency, what is?
1. A summary of this work can be found in an article by Donald R. Roberts, et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1997), pp. 295-302.
2. J. Gordon Edwards, “The Lies of Rachel Carson,” 21st Century, Summer 1992.
Edwards, a professor emeritus at San Jose State University in California, drank a spoonful of DDT in front of his entomology classes at the beginning of each school year, to make the point that DDT is not harmful to human beings. Now 83, and still fighting for the truth about DDT, Edwards is an avid mountain climber.

Internment camps and Euro coming your way.

Looks like Soros is going to get what he has wanted for many years now. Back in the 1980's I became aware of Soros and the Australian Socialist coalition. Soros was backing this euro dollar and to the socialists Soros was their god, their hero, he was to this crowd as Mo is to the islamists. . They literally worshipped the ground he walked on. He has fancied himself the world leader for a long time now, and he would use his money to prove he was worth it. What I would like to know is...where did and from where does Soros get all his money from???? He spouted for a global monetary system way back then and I think he wanted it called the euro dollar or something like that. I really wish I had of kept all the paper work I had on him when I was involved in the political realm, in the Liberal Right (conservatives). And I had it because I wanted to know what this group of socialist, commie lovers were on about and up to. I also had to put up with the Uni crowd professing their worship for him and I really got to hate going to some of my classes, especially sociology where the professional students all wanted to live in some sort of Fabian society, or a utopia of their own making through socialism. I was known as a bit of a snob back then simply because i wouldn't hang with the crowd, and i did my own thing. I was there for an education, they were there for the Austudy money so as they wouldn't have to work. They were also activists that got involved with the usual protests against government etc, and they absolutely hated anything to do with Jeff kennet or the Liberal Pollies.. They absolutely loved the required reading material, engels, marx, and all the other leftists who believed in the social construct crap.
So are we are to have a global financial dictatorship? is there going to be any sort of a referendum on this and other issues within Australia, or are we just going to be the good little 'sheeple' and baa baa all the way to our own demise?

UN and IMF Back Agenda For Global Financial Dictatorship
Posted by: "Paul Joseph Watson" onedeaddj
Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:01 am (PDT)

UN & IMF Back Agenda For Global Financial Dictatorship
Frog march to new world reserve currency system continues apace

Paul Joseph Watson
Friday, March 27, 2009

Both the IMF and the United Nations have thrown their weight behind proposals to implement a new world reserve currency system to replace the dollar as part of the acceleration towards a global financial dictatorship, in the same week that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CFR globalists that he was "open" to the idea.

Two-Faced Geithner Assures CFR Puppet Masters He's "Open" To Global
Posted by: "Paul Joseph Watson" onedeaddj
Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:25 am (PDT)

Two-Faced Geithner Assures CFR Puppet Masters He's "Open" To Global Currency
Treasury Secretary a traitor, tells American people one thing, CFR elitists another, as move towards global monetary union accelerates

Paul Joseph Watson
Thursday, March 26, 2009

In a near complete reversal of his comments on Tuesday, when he told a Congressional hearing that there were no plans to move towards a global currency to supplant the dollar, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner sought to please the elitist CFR by assuring them that he was "open" to the notion of a new global currency system.

Schwarzenegger To Provide Government Camps For Homeless

Shut down and takeover of "tent cities" stokes fears of internment pretext

Paul Joseph Watson Prison Thursday, March 26, 2009

Plans to shut down tent cities in California and relocate homeless people to government-run facilities have stoked fears that the move could be a pretext for a wider internment of Americans in the event of a total economic collapse.

Internment camps for homeless people when they can not afford to house themselves???. Is this what I am reading? Is it because the govt. will make sure the muzzos are living comfortably as a further act of appeasement and to hell with the Citizens who once worked and paid taxes. How about the internment camps for the muzzos so as to keep everyone else safe, much like what happened to the Japanese people and no matter how long they lived in Australia. The jap money was printed and ready for distribution but at the last minute it was all shelved thanks to our brave soldiers who fought their asses off protecting us all, including my father.. And don't let anyone tell you that this money bit is rumour or some conspiracy theory, coz it was printed. I fear that Australoia will follow suit and have camps ready for internment reasons....but the real big question is...internment for whom?

Finnish Trial for speaking the truth.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

***** JIHAD WATCH *****
Home page:

Free speech death watch: Finnish politician to be tried for blaspheming Islam

Blasphemer Besides blasphemy, Halla-aho was "ordered to stand trial for publishing on his blog that Islam's prophet was a pedophile."

Here again we encounter the Orwellian, or perhaps more precisely Alice-In-Wonderland, Through-the-Looking-Glass quality of today's public discourse. The collection...

Full article:
AOL users: Click here

Gees, I suppose Australia had better start building those prisons, coz we are gonna have a lot of people using them if we are going to prison for speaking the truth. I suspect Mr. Rudd will go along with outlawing freedom of speech here soon. Anything to keep 'His Soul Mate' happy.

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Just to clarify my last remark......

[Christian Nanna] New comment on EX-muslims against islam.‏
From: Mohamed (
Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2009 7:54:38 AM

Mohamed has left a new comment on your post "EX-muslims against islam":

Where in the Koran it says to fight people? The problem is people do not seperate the Koran from hadiths. Hadiths have the same place in islam as the Talmud in Judaism. The Koran came to confirm the Torah and Gospel but condemned the Talmud and Trinity.

The Koran preaches peace and tolerance and guarantees freedom of religion in over 30 verses.

Now THATS the truth

Well here ya go Mo..just in case, you can read the article in ISLAM IN ACTION. and maybe you might learn a thing or two about what TRUTH really is. Take your blinkers of Mo...and you just might see life and the koran for what it really is.

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Islam In Action: Iran Proves Me Right About Koran Verse 5:32~Video

Perfect timing to answer Mohamad's last question to me where in the koran it say to use violence...well here ya go Mo... read it and weep. Thanks Chris...coming to my rescue yet once again....

Friday, March 27, 2009

Mourners farewell Corporal Hopkins

Why is this not news of importance??? This soldier gave his life. His family, friends and fellow troopers are in mourning, yet it doesn’t seem to rank high enough to be read. So much for Aussie Pride.

Mourners farewell Corporal Hopkins
15:46 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
12 Flocks

--- --- --- --- ---

Well of course they are gonna get the blame. White, blue-eyed people are the only people in the world who buy goods, and spend money or not. No one else could possibly be blamed. Thank goodness I have green eyes.

'White, blue-eyed people caused crisis'
16:18 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
19 Flocks
--- --- --- ---- ---

What conditions could ever be agreed on as far as the taliban are concerned?. There is no compromise, no agreement and certainly no trust in them living up to any conditions to be had with these murderous bastards. Notice how many flocks this one has had. 8. The apathy of the general population of people is beginning to really piss me off. Surely the headlines are enough to get people to read them so as they might know what is happening in this crazy world.

UK may talk to Taliban 'with conditions'
16:12 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
8 Flocks
--- - - --- - - - ---

And just how does Hussein Obama reckon he is gonna manage this one. Is he going to go and personally search every inch of paki land to search for bin laden and the Taliban insurgents. Or doesn’t he know they are hiding there?
‘"Seven-and-a-half years after September 11, the al-Qaeda core leadership, Osama bin Laden and others, have moved from Kandahar, Afghanistan, to a location unknown, somewhere in Pakistan," one official said.’ And this, ‘Another key goal of the strategy is to support Pakistan's besieged Democratic government, and to help Islamabad crack down on al-Qaeda and Taliban havens on its territory’.

Obama plans to 'dismantle' al-Qaeda
14:42 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
By Stephen Collinson
21 Flocks

- - - - - --- --- --- --- --- ---

This culling of SEAL PUPS is a disgrace. The IFAW and the Animals Rights Groups should be jumping all over these hunters. Before anyone goes screaming about Kangaroos in Australia being culled…yeah it does happen however, these animals are destroying farmer’s crops and spreading disease. Just like rabbits did and still do. What harm are these seal pups doing???? What, for a bit of bloody fur. GREED.

Canadian sealers cull more than 19,000
11:01 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009

46 Flocks

--- --- - --- --- --- ---
Wow, this one had all of 7 Flocks. People must really be interested in the war on terror and knowing that terrorist scum are being released only to be let loose back among the American people, but have no fear, I am sure they will make their way back to fighting with their islamist mates, just like others who have been released from Gitmo.

Some Gitmo inmates may be released in US
13:23 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009

7 Flocks

-- --- --- --- --- ---

Talk about black & white comedy team. These 2 are going to be the absolute downfall for both our Countries. God help us all. Is all I can say to this piece.

Rudd a partner for years to come: Obama
05:35 AEST Wed Mar 25 2009

President Barack Obama has said he hoped to partner with Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd for "years to come" after forging a "meeting of the minds" in their first White House talks.
126 Flocks

--- --- --- --- ---
So where are all the do-gooders when people can’t even raise a flag.

Indonesia arresting protesters: Amnesty
17:40 AEST Fri Mar 27 2009
1 Flock
--- --- --- --- ---

But this story of world-wide importance. I am sure everyone would want to know about this…and yeah 478 people Flocked this piece of trash. Who gives a shit what people do to themselves in a bloody carwash….not like teeny-tots can take their peddle cars there to be washed and so be exposed to perverts..

Man jailed for vacuum sex act
Friday, March 27, 2009
478 Flocks

Crusader supporters combat a different GFC (Global Financial Crisis)

It is good to see that Australia has some bright, intelligent, young up and coming Christians to be our leaders in the years to come.
Even if you are not a Christian, then it is better to encourage people to live a good and decent lives. These young people are growing in numbers and will be the leaders of the future. Isn't it better than having the thugs and muslim radicals threatening to take our freedoms away from us and breaking the economy with their economic jihads in various areas that are weakoning the Australian purse.
Of course, when I seen the name of this group I just had to go and have a look. Yeah Crusaders....bring it on...Beauseant. CNanna

Crusaders' Vision
From the Australian Christian Channel News.

The Crusader Union is a Bible-based, interdenominational, Christian youth organisation which seeks to:
Share Jesus with a new generation
Nurture Christians and
Encourage church membership
Founded in 1930, Crusaders currently reaches over 30,000 young people with the gospel each year through the following programs:

Crusaders was founded in 1930 by the Rev. Dr Howard Guinness. Dr Howard Guinness was a visionary man who was keen to strengthen Christian work among school students. He saw voluntary groups as a key to achieving this. From small beginnings in just four schools, Crusaders has now grown to serve 100 independent schools in New South Wales. In 2005, it is anticipated that over 5,000 students will attend Crusaders Holiday and School camps and a further 25,000 will have heard Crusader staff speak at their schools.
Crusaders desires to help school students grow in their love and knowledge of Jesus Christ. We seek to equip students to be disciples of Jesus and to witness to their friends. As well as attending the CRU group at their school, we always look to encourage students to be involved in their local churches.

Islam In Action: UN Body OKs Call to Curb Religious Criticism

Islam In Action: UN Body OKs Call to Curb Religious Criticism

"India, which normally votes along with the council's majority of developing nations, abstained in protest at the fact that Islam was the only religion specifically named as deserving protection."

Good on India for protesting against the ridiculous farce. If Mr Rudd is so eager to have a seat at the UN, and him being a professed Christian, will he make a protest as well.? I make a protest in the name of Christianity and every other religion, that we do not like being called filthy names and threatened by muslims. So are they going to be hauled over the coals and charged with whatever, when they insult anyone of the Christian Faith or anyone who is not a bloody muslim.
Give me a break.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Victim History vs. Jihad | 3/12/2009 Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI).

Reprinted with Permission From Bill Warner

Victim History vs. Jihad
By Jamie Glazov | 3/12/2009 Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI).
FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
Warner: Thank you, Jamie, and Frontpage Magazine for having me.
FP: I would like to talk to you today about your view that the end of critical thought has arrived. First let me ask you, what exactly do you mean by critical thought?
Warner: Critical thought also can be called analytic thought or scientific analysis. A key element is that all sides of an idea are to be analyzed. There are no forbidden questions in critical thought. There is an appeal to logic and reason. Critical thought is not about feelings, but freedom of ideas.
Critical thought is the opposite of authoritative thought that is delivered fully developed by an “authority.” Authoritative thought is the use of power by controlling thought and ideas. Medieval scholasticism and Communist propaganda are examples of authoritative thought where there is no room in the public forum to disagree with the authority and if you do, you will be punished in some way. Authoritarian thought is the thought process of slavery. Freedom of thought is not allowed.
Two characteristics of critical reasoning are skepticism and humor. Skepticism means that all assumptions can be questioned. Everything is on the table. It may seem odd to have humor as part of critical thinking, but humor comes about as part of skepticism. Skepticism encourages humor because you are able to poke fun at any idea. One reason for the Mohammed cartoon riots was that Islam does not allow any skepticism or critical thought. There are no known Mohammed jokes in the Muslim world. We have jokes about God, Jesus, St. Peter, Moses, Satan and Adam. We can make a little joke at anybody’s expense because we can have freedom of thought. Humor stops at Mohammed’s door, because critical thought stops at Mohammed’s door.
FP: Why is critical thought being abandoned?
Warner: It stands in the way of the power of what I call (with a hat tip to George Orwell) the Newstate. We now live in a world that has brought together the government, universities and the media into one political system. The Newstate power determines what will be taught in schools, put into the news, and what can be discussed at forums and meetings. For instance, the Newstate prohibits our military from studying Islamic war doctrine. The State Department can only use standard political science methods to discuss Middle East and Asian policy.
The Newstate prohibits the study of political Islam in the Universities. The role of Islam in the history of slavery, the dhimmi (unbelievers living under Islamic rule) history, and the annihilation of kafir (unbeliever) civilizations is forbidden. The curriculum of the Universities only includes small samples from the Koran, the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and the Hadith (his traditions). You can get a degree in Middle East Studies without ever reading the texts of the core doctrine of Islam.
At the Rotary Club or the universities, you can have a speaker who presents dawah or Islamic missionary propaganda, but no one can present a critical analysis of Islam. Any rational/critical/analytic study of their ideology is not given room at the table. Those who know about Islam are called bigots if they try to speak from knowledge. Only Muslims and those who are ignorant about Islam (the dhimmis) are allowed to speak. Ignorance has become the only acceptable point-of-view.
The next goal of the Newstate will be to declare critical thought to be hate-speech. Islam cannot sustain critical examination, so critical thought will be made immoral and evil by our dhimmi Newstate.
FP: Why is critical thought so vital in the study of Islam?
Warner: Up until 9/11, almost all thought in the Universities saw things from the viewpoint of Islam, not from the viewpoint of kafirs. Around 270 million people have died in jihad over the last 1400 years. Yet, according to the universities, Islam just expanded, there was no suffering. That is the Islamic view, not the kafir view. Mohammed laughed when kafir heads were thrown at his feet, but no university professor calls it barbaric.
On 9/11 our universities, who are supposed to be bastions of critical thought, were found to be dishing out Islamic propaganda for our culture, instead of facts. Our leaders—political, religious, and cultural—had all been educated about Islam. What did they learn? Islam was one of the great religions; the Islamic Golden Age was the high point of history and preserved European culture; the Crusades were an exercise in ignorance and bigotry, blah, blah… That was the university propaganda that had infected our civilization. We were blindsided by our own scholars.
The intellectual vacuum created a new breed of scholars—Bat Ye’or, Andrew Bostom, Robert Spencer, Serge Trifkovic, and a host of others who were not trained about Islam in college, but who used critical analysis to tackle the most pressing questions of the day: What is Islam? What does it mean to kafirs? This is the most important question to ask.
FP: Why is the kafir viewpoint so important?
Warner: The only thing that matters to the kafir about Islam is how it treats the kafir. What does it matter to a kafir if a Muslim tries to use the bathroom following the way of Mohammed? What do I care how a Muslim prays? Prayer and bathrooms do not concern me. I care about how Mohammed treated kafirs and that was horrible, terrible and the perfect example of how Muslims are to treat kafirs. Notice that this view is in contrast to how a Muslim sees Mohammed—that is the Muslim-centric view. They are never the same view.
The post-9/11 scholars viewed Islam from the standpoint of the victims—the kafirs and the dhimmis. The new scholars used critical thinking to define a new viewpoint of Islam—kafir-centric.
The answers from kafir-centric scholars about Islam all agree on what Islam and its history is. The kafir-centric thinkers agree as to what the current political situation means. This is remarkable. Note that they do not agree on what to do about it, but they all agree on the nature of the problem and not one of them agrees with the university/media/government, the Newstate, position on Islam.
Every critical thinker reaches the same conclusions. Why should this be a surprise? The very essence of critical thinking is being objective. The result does not depend upon the person. It is not an opinion, but an exercise in logic. Any person who performs the experiments can prove the truth or falseness of, say, Newton’s laws of motion.
It is the same with Islam. Anyone can start with the Koran, the Sira (the life of Mohammed) and the Hadith (his traditions) and they will arrive at the same conclusions as long as they use logic and analysis. Part of the analysis is whether you analyze the doctrine from the standpoint of a Muslim or a kafir. For instance, on the day that Mohammed killed 800 Jews in Medina it was a good thing from the standpoint of a believer, but a terrible day for the kafir Jews. Good from one point of view, but very bad from a kafir point of view.
There is a third view of Islamic scholarship—the dhimmi view. Dhimmis are kafirs that serve Islam. Dhimmis write about the doctrine of Islam just like the Muslims, but without the devotional overtones. The Newstate holds the dhimmi-centric view and wants to outlaw the kafir-centric school of thought.
FP: Why do you think they want to outlaw the kafir-centric school of thought?
Warner: Kafir-centric scholars can kick anybody’s butt in any argument or discussion about Islam. We are a mountain of facts and understand the mind of Islam. We can answer all of the questions with authority. We hold the high moral ground and yet, we are called bigots for our knowledge and labors. We are denied a forum in the public. Only the voice of the authority of the Newstate can speak about Islam.
Notice that when someone who is from the Newstate speaks, they never actual talk about any facts about Islam. Or if they do quote some fact, like George Bush with his half of a Koran verse, or Obama with his Golden Rule spin on one hadith, it is no more than a sentence they parse out of the doctrine.
Since the kafir-centric thinkers can overpower any of the drones from the Newstate, the main goal of the Newstate is to see that we do not get a forum. We are never invited to the party at the university when a dhimmi or Muslim speaks. If there is a multicultural “dialogue” we are never allowed to ask difficult questions. Our voices are not heard in the State department, the Pentagon or FBI. During Mumbai, we were never given any airtime. Face-time with any government/media/university official will not happen, because it cannot happen. At all times the Newstate tries to keep a Muslim brotherhood type around to be a Praetorian guard if they suspect anyone who actually knows Islam might show up.
When the Center for the Study of Political Islam was started, the basic assumption was that once the doctrine of political Islam was laid out in a clear language, kafirs would flock to it. But most of the population is filled with the Newstate platitudes and talks about moderate Muslims, etc. They are desperately ignorant and refuse to engage logical analysis.
I have seen religious leaders grow angry at a lecture about what Mohammed did to other religions. They were desperate not to know, and they remained arrogantly ignorant. So they will tell others about Islam based upon their ignorance. Ignorance is an acceptable point-of-view about Islam. Any dhimmi or Muslim can get a forum at any time; kafir-centric scholars are condemned as bigots and troublemakers and denied a place at the table.
FP: How are the Kafirs doing in the ideological battle?
Warner: We have to face the facts. Kafirs are losing on every front. We now live in a Christian-Muslim nation according to our commander-in-chief-dhimmi. Priests, professors, preachers, politicians, pundits and rabbis all line up in obedience to Mohammed. If placed anywhere near the doctrinal/historical facts about political Islam, they grow tense and tell you about the “nice Muslim” they have met. It seems as though every city has a “nice Muslim” that is passed from dhimmi leader to dhimmi leader, so they can all say they know one.
Actual knowledge about the true history and doctrine of political Islam is not only nil, but the desire to know more is nonexistent. Responses about Islam are denials about what Islam is and what it does. Liberal preachers and rabbis, for instance, are political Islam’s supporters and mouth tales about how well Islam and Judaism co-existed in the Middle Ages and how Jews and Muslims were fellow scholars. They refuse to engage in any sort of rational/critical/analytic discussion about Islam. The rest have different excuses, but they remain in the dhimmi camp.
Critical thinking is being abandoned as fast as Klan robes at an ACLU meeting. One thing is very clear—the enemy is no longer political Islam. The enemy of critical thought is the dhimmi. It is the dhimmis who carry water for Islam and do great damage to our civilization.
FP: Why are the dhimmis desperate not to know about Islam?
Warner: Money is the motivation of one set of dhimmis—the professors. Islam pours a great deal of money into the university system. It is very easy to purchase a professor and a department. Everything from building funds, professorships, trips, and grants purchase the loyalty of dhimmi universities. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you. We must also include the dhimmi political types being bribed by the Saudis.
The other answer is laziness and fear, with fear in the lead. Everyone starts off at less than zero. The universities taught us that Islam was good, Golden Age, yada, yada or at worst—benign. The Newstate loves Islam just like they love illegal immigrants. Just watch CNN, read the NY Times and listen to the President. Islamic life is good, and where it is not good, it is our fault—colonialism and Bush. So if you float downstream, why would you want to learn anything?
The Newstate making the learning process difficult also helps laziness. Islam deliberately made the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith hard to understand and the professors went along with the Islam-is-hard propaganda. The Koran is notorious for never being read, much less understood. Why? The universities did not want to make it simple.
But we come to the big one—fear. Everyone has a clue that Islam’s dualistic nature contains unlimited violence, but that clue remains in the background. Saying you are afraid of Islam is like a white woman saying she is afraid of black males. Expressing your fear is proof of your racism and bigotry.
There is a larger fear—what if the boogieman really is underneath the bed? What will we do? People are desperately ignorant. Otherwise intelligent people believe the most contradictory things, but wind up with—Islam must be good, it just has to be good, because if it is not good, I cannot imagine what we will do. There is fear. Desperate fear.
What if the preacher or rabbi who attended the interfaith dialogs finds out that the imam was a liar? His congregation does not want to hear it. What if the politician finds out about the true nature of Islam? The media and the Moslem voters rule him. The media is so intellectually corrupt that they are past discussion.
If you don’t know, you don’t have to deal with it. Ignorance is good. All the leaders are ignorant, they are rich and powerful, and so they must be right. Turn off your mind and float downstream. Dhimmis are floaters.
FP: How can we educate these dhimmis and change their point of view?
Warner: It turns out that there is one aspect of Islam that even dhimmis will pay attention to—the history of the victim, in particular, their own victims. Our Tears of Jihad project teaches about just that—the history of the victims of jihad.
Based upon victim history, we have created a new idea in newsletters. The idea is not to present any facts about Islam. Facts about Islam produce panic, denial and fear. We decided to present the suffering of a group without the doctrine that causes it. Our goal is to show religious leadership and individuals what suffering is visited upon their group.
The first one of these was the Bulletin of Jew Hatred (the term Jew hatred comes from Bostom’s wonderful Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism). We have added the Bulletin of Christian Persecution and the Bulletin of the Oppression of Women. The Bulletin of Cultural Annihilation and the Bulletin of Asian Annihilation are in the works. The Bulletins give a summary with a link to the original article. We only report actual events, not blogs, editorials or comments. The Bulletin has the motto: Facts without comments—we collect the dots; you connect them.
Each Bulletin gives a very short summary of each of the actual events—who, what, when, where, but no why. The no “why” makes it easy for everybody to read, even the left, since all comments that relate to the actual doctrine or history of political Islam are called right wing or conservative. It is peculiar, but to have knowledge about the actual doctrine and history of political Islam is being conservative. That leaves ignorance to be the official policy of the progressives/liberals/left. Knowledge is considered to be the basis of bigotry, ignorance is considered to be virtue, according to the ethics of the Newstate.
The Bulletins come out weekly. It is like a drumbeat—each week the events roll on and the steady stream of news tells another story that is not told by the Newstate media.
FP: How has the Bulletin of Jew Hatred been received?
Warner: I have been told by one of the first readers of Jew Hatred that she thought herself to be well informed, but every event in the Bulletin was new to her. A reader of the Christian Bulletin said that he never knew that this was happening to Christians. This is the story that the Newstate refuses to tell. It is the story you have to decide not to see and not to report.
We are finding that people are receptive. Since we don’t have any comments, this means that they can’t throw up the barrier of partisan politics or those comments are bigoted opinions. A liberal rabbi said that he liked the no comment, just the facts.
So, we have created a stealth weapon that flies under the PC, multicultural radar. But in designing it, we realized that critical analysis was not a good general approach. People don’t want to hear anything bad about Islam, but they will examine their own battle causalities.
The key word is here is their “own.” This is the reason we have a Bulletin for every group. Hopefully, this idea will educate and illuminate the problem with political Islam. If you are interested in our newsletter or Bulletins, go to and sign up.
I’d like to take this time if I could to make a pitch for help. We are looking for an editor for the Hindu bulletin.
We need bird dogs, people who can help get the Bulletins to relevant organizations and groups. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, women, intellectuals, artists, pagans, gays, free people everywhere—the bulletins document your suffering on a weekly basis. Help us educate groups that directly influence these people.
If you want to participate in any way with the Bulletins, please email me at:
FP: Bill Warner, thank you for joining us.
Warner: Thank you Jamie for this opportunity to speak to your readers.

Aussies needed.

I believe we need more Aussies to join this fight against the current muslim/sharia law/jihadist situation. I know there are many bloggers out there who are just as concerned as I am.
When Chris Logan got his FACEBOOK up and running, I thought..."excellent job" There are many people on this network and as far as I am aware, there is one other Australian besides myself in this particular network. I think the more people on the one network can be a formidable force, especially one that holds hands across the seas.

You can get there through my links.

You can access my FB by following this link. Diane johnson

To view Christopher's profile or write on his Wall, follow this link:

Come on Aussies, we can do it.


Judeo-Christian Violence vs. Islamic Violence

This is a very timely article. More in response to muslims against sharia, equating crusades with islamists. There is NO comparison except in the sense that the Crusades happened in response to muslim rapes, pillages and murders. An excellent essay from Raymond Ibrahim on MEF.

Conflating History with Theology
Judeo-Christian Violence vs. Islamic Violence
by Raymond Ibrahim
Jihad Watch
March 15, 2009

Especially after the terrorist strikes of 9/11, Islam has often been accused of being intrinsically violent. Many point to the Koran and other Islamic scriptures and texts as proof that violence and intolerance vis-à-vis non-Muslims is inherent to Islam. In response, a number of apologetics have been offered. The fundamental premise of almost all of these is that Islam's purported violence—as found in Islamic scriptures and history—is no different than the violence committed by other religious groups throughout history and as recorded in their scriptures, such as Jews and Christians. The argument, in short, is that it is not Islam per se but rather human nature that is prone to violence.
So whenever the argument is made that the Koran as well as the historical words and deeds of Islam's prophet Muhammad and his companions evince violence and intolerance, the counter-argument is immediately made: What about the historical atrocities committed by the Hebrews in years gone by and as recorded in their scriptures (AKA, the Old Testament)? What about the brutal cycle of violence Christians have committed in the name of their faith against both fellow Christians and non-Christians?
Several examples are then offered from the Bible as well as Judeo-Christian history. Two examples especially—one biblical, the other historic—are often cited as paradigmatic of the religious violence inherent to both Judaism and Christianity and usually put an end to the debate of whether Islam is unique in regards to its teachings and violence.
The first is the military conquest of the land of Canaan by the Hebrews (c. 1200 BC), which has increasingly come to be characterized as a "genocide." Yahweh told Moses:
But of the cities of these peoples which Yahweh your God gives you as an inheritance, you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, but you shall utterly destroy them—the Hittite, Amorite, Canaanite, Perizzite, Hivite, and Jebusite—just as Yahweh your God has commanded you, lest they teach you to do according to all their abominations which they have done for their gods, and you sin against Yahweh your God (Deuteronomy 20: 16-18).
So Joshua [Moses' successor] conquered all the land: the mountain country and the South and the lowland and the wilderness slopes, and all their kings; he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as Yahweh God of Israel had commanded (Joshua 10:40).
The second example revolves around the Crusader wars waged by Medieval European Christians. To be sure, the Crusades were a "counter-attack" on Islam—not an unprovoked assault as is often depicted by revisionist history. A united Christendom sought to annex the Holy Land of Jerusalem, which, prior to its conquest by Islam in the 7th century, was an integral part of Christendom for nearly 400 years.
Moreover, Muslim invasions and atrocities against Christians were on the rise in the decades before the Crusades were launched in 1096. For example, in 1071, the Seljuk Turks had crushed the Byzantines in the pivotal battle of Manzikert and in effect annexed a major chunk of Byzantine Anatolia (opening the way for the eventual capture of Constantinople centuries later). A few decades earlier, the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim desecrated and destroyed a number of important churches—such as the Church of St. Mark in Egypt and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem—and decreed several even more oppressive than usual decrees against Christians and Jews. It is in this backdrop that Pope Urban called for the Crusades:
From the confines of Jerusalem and the city of Constantinople a horrible tale has gone forth and very frequently has been brought to our ears, namely, that a race from the kingdom of the Persians [i.e., Muslim Turks]…has invaded the lands of those Christians and has depopulated them by the sword, pillage and fire; it has led away a part of the captives into its own country, and a part it has destroyed by cruel tortures; it has either entirely destroyed the churches of God or appropriated them for the rites of its own religion (from the chronicles of Robert the Monk).
Nonetheless, history attests that these Crusades were violent and bloody. After breaching the walls of Jerusalem in 1099, the Crusaders slaughtered almost every single inhabitant of the Holy City. According to the Medieval chronicle, the Gesta Danorum "the slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles." Moreover, there is the 1204 sack of Constantinople, wherein Crusader slew Christian.
In light of the above—one a prime example of "Hebraic" violence from the Bible, the other from Christian history—why should Islam be the one religion always characterized as intrinsically violent, simply because its holy book and its history also contain violence? Why should non-Muslims always point to the Koran and ancient history as evidence of Islam's violence while never looking to their own scriptures and history?
While such questions are popular, they reveal a great deal of confusion between history and theology, between the temporal actions of men and what are understood to be the immutable words of God. The fundamental error being that Judeo-Christian history—which is violent—is being conflated with Islamic theology—which commands violence. Of course all religions have had their fair share of violence and intolerance towards the "other." Whether this violence is ordained by God or whether warlike man merely wished it thus is the all-important question.
Old Testament violence is an interesting case in point. Yahweh clearly ordered the Hebrews to annihilate the Canaanites and surrounding peoples. Such violence is therefore an expression of God's will, for good or ill. Regardless, all the historic violence committed by the Hebrews and recorded in the Old Testament is just that—history. It happened; God commanded it. But it revolved around a specific time and place and was directed against a specific people. At no time did such violence go on to become standardized or codified into Jewish law (i.e., the Halakha).
This is where Islamic violence is unique. Though similar to the violence of the Old Testament—commanded by God and manifested in history—certain aspects of Islamic violence have become standardized in Islamic law (i.e., Sharia) and apply at all times. Thus while the violence found in the Koran is in fact historical, its ultimate significance is theological, or, more specifically, doctrinal. Consider the following Koranic verses, better known as the "sword-verses":
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the pagans wherever you find them—take them [captive], besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due [i.e. submit to Islam], then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (K 9:5).
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger [i.e. do not adhere to Islamic law], nor acknowledge the religion of Truth [i.e. Islam], from the people of the book [i.e. Jews and Christians], until they pay tribute with willing submission, and feel themselves utterly subdued (K 9:29).
As with Old Testament verses where Yahweh commanded the Hebrews to attack and slay their neighbors, the sword-verses also have a historical context. Allah first issued these commandments after the Muslims under Muhammad's leadership had grown sufficiently strong enough to invade their Christian and pagan neighbors. But unlike the bellicose verses and anecdotes of the Old Testament, the sword-verses became fundamental to Islam's subsequent relationship to both the "people of the book" (Christians and Jews) and the "pagans" (Hindus, Buddhists, animists, etc). For instance, based on 9:5, Islamic law mandates that pagans and polytheists must either convert to Islam or be killed, while 9:29 is the primary source of Islam's well-known discriminatory practices against Christians and Jews.
In fact, based on the sword-verses (as well as countless other Koranic verses and oral traditions attributed to Muhammad), Islam's scholars, sheikhs, muftis, imams, and qadis throughout the ages have all reached the consensus—binding on the entire Muslim community—that Islam is to be at perpetual war with the non-Muslim world until the former subsumes the latter. (It is widely held by Muslim scholars that since the sword-verses are among the final revelations on the topic of Islam's relationship to non-Muslims, that they alone have abrogated some 200 of the Koran's earlier and more tolerant verses, such as "there is no coercion in religion" 2:256.) Famous Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, who is revered in the West for his "progressive" insights, also puts to rest the notion that jihad is "defensive" warfare:
In the Muslim community, the holy war [jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force...The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense... They are merely required to establish their religion among their own people. That is why the Israeilites after Moses and Joshua remained unconcerned with royal authority [e.g. a "caliphate"]. Their only concern was to establish their religion [not spread it to the nations]… But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations (The Muqudimmah, vol. 1 pg. 473).
Perhaps what is most unique about the sword-verses is the fact that when juxtaposed to their Old Testament counterparts, they are especially distinct for using language that transcends time and space, inciting believers to attack and slay non-believers today no less than yesterday. Yahweh commanded the Hebrews to kill Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites—all specific peoples rooted to a specific time and place. At no time did Yahweh give an open-ended command for the Hebrews, and by extension their descendants the Jews, to fight and kill gentiles. On the other hand, though Islam's original enemies were, like Judaism's, historical (e.g., Christian Byzantines and pagan Persians), the Koran rarely singles them out by their proper names. Instead, Muslims were (and are) commanded to fight the people of the book—"until they pay tribute with willing submission and feel themselves utterly subdued" (Koran 9:29) and to "slay the pagans wherever you find them" (Koran 9:5).
The two conjunctions "until" (hata) and "wherever" (haythu) demonstrate the perpetual and ubiquitous nature of these commandments: there are still "people of the book" who have yet to be "utterly subdued" (especially in the Americas, Europe, and Israel) and "pagans" to be slain "wherever" one looks (especially Asia and sub-Saharan Africa). In fact, the salient feature of almost all of the violent commandments in Islamic scriptures is their open-ended and generic nature: "Fight them [non-Muslims] until there is no more chaos and all religion belongs to Allah" (Koran 8:39). Also, in a well-attested tradition that appears in the most authentic hadith collections, Muhammad proclaims:
I have been commanded to wage war against mankind until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and that they establish prostration prayer, and pay the alms-tax [i.e., convert to Islam]. If they do so, their blood and property are protected [Sahih Muslim C9B1N31; also in Sahih Bukhari B2N24].
Aside from the divine words of the Koran, Muhammad's pattern of behavior—his "Sunna" or "example"—is an extremely important source of legislation in Islam. Muslims are exhorted to emulate Muhammad in all walks of life: "You have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern [of conduct]" (Koran 33:21). And Muhammad's pattern of conduct vis-à-vis non-Muslims is quite explicit. Sarcastically arguing against the concept of "moderate" Islam, terrorist Osama bin Laden, who enjoys half the Arab-Islamic world's support per an al-Jazeera poll, portrays the prophet's Sunna thus:
"Moderation" is demonstrated by our prophet who did not remain more than three months in Medina without raiding or sending a raiding party into the lands of the infidels to beat down their strongholds and seize their possessions, their lives, and their women" (from The Al-Qaeda Reader, page 56).
In fact, based on both the Koran and Muhammad's Sunna, pillaging and plundering infidels, enslaving their children, and placing their women in concubinage is well founded (e.g. 4:24, 4:92, 8:69, 24:33, 33:50, etc.). And the concept of "Sunna"—which is what 90% of the billion plus Muslims, the "Sunnis," are named after—essentially asserts that anything performed or approved by Muhammad and his early companions is applicable for Muslims today no less than yesterday. This does not mean that Muslims in mass are wild hedonists who live only to plunder and rape. But it does mean that those particular persons who are naturally inclined to such activities, and who also happen to be Muslim, can—and do—quite easily justify their actions by referring to the "Sunna of the Prophet"—the way al-Qaeda, for example, justifies its attacks on 9/11 where innocents, including women and children, were killed: Muhammad authorized his followers to use catapults during their siege of the town of Taif in 630 A.D., though he was aware that women and children were sheltered there. Also, when asked if it was permissible to launch night raids or set fire to the fortifications of the infidels if women and children were among them, the prophet is said to have responded, "They are from among them" (Sahih Muslim B19N4321).
While law-centric and legalistic, Judaism has no such equivalent to the Sunna; the words and deeds of the patriarchs, though recorded in the Old Testament, never went on to be part of Jewish law. Neither Abraham's "white-lies," nor Jacob's perfidy, nor Moses' short-fuse, nor David's adultery, nor Solomon's philandering ever went on to instruct Jews or Christians. They were merely understood to be historical actions perpetrated by fallible men who were often punished by God for their less than ideal behavior.
As for Christianity, much of the Old Testament law was abrogated by Jesus. "Eye for an eye" gave way to "turn the other cheek." Totally loving God and one's neighbor became supreme law (Matt 22:38-40). Furthermore, Jesus' "Sunna"—as in "What would Jesus do?"—is characterized by altruism. The New Testament contains absolutely no exhortations to violence. Still, there are some who strive to portray Jesus as having a similar militant ethos as Muhammad by quoting the verse where Jesus—who "spoke to the multitudes in parables and without a parable spoke not" (Matt 13:34)—said, "I come not to bring peace but a sword" (Matt 10:34). But based on the context of this statement, it is clear that Jesus was not commanding violence against non-Christians, but was predicting that strife will often exist between Christian converts and their environment—a prediction that was only too true as early Christians, far from taking up the sword, passively perished by the sword in martyrdom (as they still do today in many Muslim nations). At any rate, how can one honestly compare this one New Testament verse that metaphorically mentions the word "sword" to the literally hundreds of Koranic injunctions and statements by Muhammad that clearly command Muslims to take up a very real sword against non-Muslims?
And it is from here that one can best appreciate the Crusades. However one interprets these wars—as offensive or defensive, just or unjust—it is evident that they were not based on the "Sunna" of Jesus, who exhorted his followers to "love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you" (Matt 5:44).
In fact, far from suggesting anything intrinsic to Christianity, the Crusades ironically help better explain Islam. For what the Crusades demonstrated once and for all is that, irrespective of religious teachings—indeed, in the case of these so-called "Christian" Crusades, despite them—man is in fact predisposed to violence and intolerance. But this begs the question: If this is how Christians behaved—who are commanded to love, bless, and do good to their enemies who hate, curse, and persecute them—how much more can be expected of Muslims who, while sharing the same violent tendencies, are further validated by the Deity's command to attack, kill, and plunder non-believers?
To receive articles regularly by email, join the MEF News mailing list.
This text may be reposted so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

FaceBook links

I am now a part of Chris Logans network, ...from Islam In Action, as well as a few other prominent networks. From here, it is easier to be a part of some great networks such as Ali Sina, Robert Spencer and some other people whose work is admired and respected. Of course there are people who seems to be hagglers and sceptics of all sorts of things, but hey, we are all allowed to have our own opinions.
There is a group I joined....Muslims against sharia. Now I am hoping these people are genuine, and not practicing tagiyah. They do want to stop the violence etc, which is great. But I am yet to hear from them on whether they are happy to let people practice whatever religion they want peace...or do they simply want peace - after everyone else has converted to islam.? Are they willing to be a part of the wider community? And share in all it does. I have been hearing from 'experts' who say there is no such thing as a moderate muslim. They are either muslim or not. If they believe in the koran then they revere old Mo. And I am afraid I can have no respect for anyone who follows this pedophile, raiding, raping, thief, madman, self-proclaimed prophet, or thinks he is the best thing since sliced bread.
I am willing to wait and find out where their true allegiances lie.

You can access my FB by following this link. Diane johnson

To view Christopher's profile or write on his Wall, follow this link:

To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Islam In Action: Demoting Islam’s Religion Status

Islam In Action: Demoting Islam’s <em>Religion</em> Status

I urge everyone to read this excellent article. Thinking back to when Australia would not let notorious Gerry Adams from the IRA into Australia, I thought it was kind of strange at the time. I can't help but wonder though, that if he had of labelled his terrorist group as a religion then he would have been welcomed with open arms just like the devil spawn from iran Mohammad Khatami is welcomed here by Anglican Arch Bishop Philip Freier, the treasonous leftard, who has helped this ex-prez of Iran Mohammad Khatami to talk at Latrobe Uni THIS Thursday night, 7:15 at the Western Lecture Hall. Islam should be classified for what it is...a terrorist is NOT a religion.

Victorian Islamic body tried to put a company out of business

Islamic council 'defamed halal firm for market monopoly'
Posted Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:17pm AEDT
Updated Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:16pm AEDT

A court has heard a Victorian Islamic body tried to put a company out of business so it could monopolise the certification of meat for consumption by Muslims.

The court heard the Islamic Co-ordinating Council of Victoria wanted a monopoly on certifying halal meat, an industry worth hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

A statement of claim filed with the court shows the council sent letters to a dozen abattoirs defaming a business called Aus-Halal that it believed was its competition.

It states the letter wrongly claimed that Aus-Halal was not certifying meat properly and was threatening exports to Muslim countries.

Abdul Ayan from Aus-Halal claims he was brought into hatred, contempt and ridicule because of the letters and his business suffered.

The hearing continues.

Bulletin of Cultural Annihilation March 20, 2009

So many thanks to Politicalislam for this and other Bulletins
Bulletin of Cultural Annihilation March 20, 2009
Facts without comments - we collect the dots, you connect them
Please distribute this bulletin and send us events that you find.
North America

Mar. 3, 2009
Santa Monica, CA
Hizbullah receives $20 million annually from proceeds of pirated films in South America-- the tri-border area of Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay.
March 10, 2009

Washington, DC
National Intelligence nominee Charles Freeman, after two decades of work as a Chinese and Saudi lobbyist, blames the Jews for opposition to his appointment.

March 11, 2009
Washington, DC
The man who nominated Charles Freeman, Dennis Blair, found to have deceived Congress about Charles Freeman’s lobbying activities for China and Saudi Arabia.

March 15, 2009
Providence, RI
Episcopal priest converts to Islam and refuses to resign her paying job as a parish priest.

March 16, 2009
Tampa, FL
An Egyptian who entered the US on a student visa was indicted by a grand jury for smuggling explosives into Florida.

March 17, 2009
Washington, DC
Obama Backs Off Pledge to Affirm Armenian Genocide.
The massacre of 1.5 million Christians by the Muslims in 1915 precipitated American involvement in WWI against Turkey and is the largest genocide in history before Hitler’s extermination of 6 million Jews. The previous record was the Chmielniecki Genocide by Czarist Russia, in which 800,000 Jews were murdered.

March 17, 2009
Washington, DC
Iranian businessman arrested for attempting to ship classified military equipment from the US to Iran through dummy corporations and fake export manifests.

March 17, 2009
Washington, DC
Europe reluctant to help President Obama’s efforts to dismantle Guantanamo Detention Center because of their own terrorism fears.

March 18, 2009
Washington, DC
Uzi Arad, who is in line to become Prime Minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu's chief of the National Security Council, is forbidden from entering the United States, according to a report in Tuesday's Washington Times.
South America

March 10, 2009
Bogata, Columbia
Five Middle-Easterners linked to Hezbollah, the Office of Envigado and the North Valley Cartel expect the Supreme Court to approve their extradition to the United States. Translated article here .

February 24, 2009
London, England
British Medical Journal claims heroic status as ‘free speech defender’ when printing five articles in one issue on press intimidation by the Israel lobby. The most famous authors on the intimidation and censorship by the Israel lobby, Mersheimer and Walt, wrote “The Israel Lobby" and received an $800,000 advance from their publisher for their courage.

March 9, 2009
London, England
The British 150 million dollar anti-terrorism project, which pays Muslims to vote for the left-wing labour Party, is fanning the flames of extremism, states a report by the “Policy Exchange” think-tank in London.

March 10, 2009
Brussels, Belgium
Vice-President Biden to Taleban: 95% of the Taleban is moderate.

March 12, 2009
Athens, Greece
A Greek terrorist group called ‘Revolutionary Struggle’ claims credit for two CitiBank bombings in Athens as a part of their effort against the “criminal network of International Capital”.

March 12, 2009
Horsham, England
World to United States: You pay for the economic mess. G-20 conference calls for US and not Europe to go into debt to stimulate the world economy. Also here.

March 12, 2009
Paris, France
Reporters Without Borders declared “Enemies of the Internet” for censorship the “Gang of 12”; which is: 7 Muslim countries and 5 dominated by Communist China - China, Burma, North Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Cuba and Tunisia.

March 13, 2009
The Hague, Netherlands
Anti-Jihad Dutch leader Geert Wilders receives 285 death threats of a total of 428 made against all Dutch politicians in 2008. Police set up a special Threatened Politicians Bureau to deal with Muslim threats to Dutch elected leaders.

March 14, 2009
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Muslim Ertan Kilic publishes the home addresses of Dutch politicians on his website, Cyber Djihad, and uses the blog-name Rametullah. Kilic is a citizen of Turkey but has a work-visa for the Netherlands.

March 15, 2009
London, England
‘Moderate’ Muslim advisor on terrorism to the British government stabs to death a man in his home. Inayat Bunglawala was featured on the BBC and in many newspapers as the moderate ‘voice’ of British Islam, was assistant general secretary and Press spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, appointed to a Home Office taskforce on radical Islam in the UK, and briefed Security Minister Tony McNulty on the threat of radical Islam.

March 16, 2009
Rotterdam, Netherlands
For the second time within three days, the United States' Federal Bureau of Investigations was asked by Dutch police to help trace an internet user who threatened to carry out another school massacre, this time at three multilingual schools in Rotterdam.

March 19, 2009
Paris, France
Organized labor in France goes on strike in France, forcing several firms into bankruptcy, to force French government to increase employment.

March, 2009
Tokyo, Japan
The Japan Times editorialized against the UN Conference Against Racism (Durban II), which is dominated by an Arab political agenda that seeks to delegitimize Israel, because the United Nations Human Rights Conference is so racist and hypocritical that it undermines the credibility of the UN generally.

Middle East
March 5, 2009
Tel Aviv, Israel
Iran sends Hiszbullah 1 Billion dollars to buy the upcoming (June, 2009) election in Lebanon.
Info-Prod Research (Middle East) Ltd.

March 10, 2009
Palestinian Territories
Electronic Intifada reports that the Israeli labor union, Histadrut which is associated with the Labor Party in Israel, is not a trade union at all but rather a Jewish conspiracy to infiltrate international labor with Zionism.

March 11, 2009
Kabul, Afghanistan
Taleban to VP Biden: No, there is no moderate Taleban; just the Taleban.

March 11, 2009
Jerusalem, Israel
British member of Parliament openly funds Hamas in Gaza and hypocritically taunts British government to prosecute him as a criminal while knowing full well he has 100% immunity from criminal prosecution as a member of Parliament.

March 19, 2009
Iran cracks down on 2003 Nobel Prize Winner Shirin Ebadi for lobbying against the use of land-mines and their impact on children.

Winter 2009
The Islamist takeover of Turkey is gaining ground and Islamists have seized control of the civil service, banking boards, and the judiciary.

United Nations
March 17, 2009
Geneva, Switzerland
UN Human Rights Commission crumbles to Muslims by refusing to include homophobia as discrimination. Hamas is defined by the UNHRC as battling racism in its war against Israel.

March 18, 2009
New York, NY (UN HQ)
UN General Assembly president states that Iran’s threats to blow up Israel with nuclear weapons are just words and “words don’t kill” but cririsizes the United States for demonizing Iran verbally.

January 9, 2009.
A message to the people of Gaza in Arabic (with English subtitles) from Israel Defense Forces spokesman Capt. Avichai Adraee.
February 26, 2009
Video of Muslim leader calling for Anthrax attacks and stating that this type of attack could easily kill 300,000 Americans.
February 26, 2009
Hamas calls for Jihad on all non Muslims everywhere.
March 15, 2009
Geneva, Switzerland
UN Human Rights Commission’s regular proceedings included the statement, “The Jews are enemies of the Almighty, the Jews are the enemies of Allah, the enemies of faith, and the enemies of all humankind and Commission refuses to discuss Arab anti-semitism when Human Rights activist David Littman is shut down.
This material is not copyrighted. Please forward. You may remove the header and the by-line, if that suits your purposes. If you wish to get a direct subscription, go to and sign up for our newsletters.
Produced by
Publisher: Bill Warner; Editor: Andrew N; Editor-in-Chief: Kendra M

Tears of Jihad
These figures are a rough estimate of the death of non-Muslims by the political act of jihad.

Thomas Sowell [Thomas Sowell, Race and Culture, BasicBooks, 1994, p. 188] estimates that 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. For every slave captured many others died. Estimates of this collateral damage vary. The renowned missionary David Livingstone estimated that for every slave who reached a plantation, five others were killed in the initial raid or died of illness and privation on the forced march.[Woman’s Presbyterian Board of Missions, David Livingstone, p. 62, 1888] Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old. These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.
120 million Africans

The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:
60 million Christians

Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism in India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”
80 million Hindus

Buddhists do not keep up with the history of war. Keep in mind that in jihad only Christians and Jews were allowed to survive as dhimmis (servants to Islam); everyone else had to convert or die. Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India. The total is roughly 10 million. [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-1.]
10 million Buddhists

Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions. After that, the Jews submitted and became the dhimmis (servants and second class citizens) of Islam and did not have geographic political power.

This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad.